5 Steep Costs That Companies Pay Because Of A Toxic Boss

5 Steep Costs That Companies Pay Because Of A Toxic Boss
Ashish_Choudhary / Pixabay

Working for a difficult or temperamental boss is common in the U.S. One survey showed roughly half of the employees quit their job due to what they termed a toxic boss.

Get The Full Seth Klarman Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Seth Klarman in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

But high turnover isn’t the only downside such bosses cause. Abrasive or toxic leadership creates many other costs for organizations and employees as well, from personal health to the company’s financial health, says Dr. Katrina Burrus, author of Managing Brilliant Jerks: How Organizations and Coaches Can Transform Difficult Leaders into Powerful Visionaries.

Gates Capital Management Reduces Risk After Rare Down Year [Exclusive]

Gates Capital Management's ECF Value Funds have a fantastic track record. The funds (full-name Excess Cash Flow Value Funds), which invest in an event-driven equity and credit strategy, have produced a 12.6% annualised return over the past 26 years. The funds added 7.7% overall in the second half of 2022, outperforming the 3.4% return for Read More

“Toxic behavior in leadership at the workplace has a trickle-down effect that spreads throughout the leader’s division,” Burrus says. “And if left unchecked, it can spread through and adversely affect the whole organization.

“Talented but toxic leaders are brilliant jerks whose volatile behavior causes the people around them to be much less productive and successful than they can be. These are bosses who intimidate, isolate, undermine and divide. And the longer a company lets the behavior go, the more the costs will mount.”

The Costs To An Organization For Having A Toxic Boss

Burrus points out some of the costs to an organization when a toxic boss cause a deteriorating work environment:

Communication is compromised.

When a boss is a difficult character with unpredictable moods, people fear telling them anything less than good news, Burrus says. “As a result, problems that the leader could help solve go unsolved or are rerouted around them,” she says. “These kinds of leaders also show favoritism, creating resentment, individual agendas, and more dysfunction. Employees who once collaborated well now gossip behind each other’s backs and projects suffer.”

People lose motivation.

Toxic leaders want most of the credit and are quick and to shoot down others’ ideas, Burrus says. “This kills confidence in some team members as well as creativity and motivation,” she says. “Talented and intelligent people aren’t being fully utilized. Why would someone offer a fabulous idea when they feel their boss will take that idea for themselves or humiliate them in front of the group?”

Strategies don't get fully implemented.

Company strategies call for streamlining  between leadership and staff to plan and implement. “But often, the strategy never gets off the ground, or if it does, not smoothly,” Burrus says. “It’s tough for the team members to get aligned as they should when there is distrust or fear of the leader. It’s hard for people to follow consistently when the leader is pushing back or pushing too hard.”

Absenteeism and ‘presenteeism’ add to the troubles.

Presenteeism means you’re physically present at work, but not really there mentally, Burris says. And absenteeism is a common effect of volatile leadership as workers don’t want to be there at all. “If you’re present but don’t desire to be, then you are too upset by how the leader acts to feel comfortable or capable of doing your job at a high level,” she says.  “Absenteeism could involve legitimate health issues that are the result of the stress the leader creates. And that leads to major organizational costs.”

Leader and employee turnover both rise.

Burrus points to a study by the Centre for Creative Leadership showing that about 40% of new executives fail within the first 18 months. “You want your leader to grow on the job and be a catalyst of growth for your organization,” Burrus says. “But that doesn’t happen when people are burning out quickly on them. And when you have relatively high employee turnover as a result of toxic boss, the constant change disrupts company performance. We all know the financial costs of recruiting and replacing people, and then there’s the cost to the company reputation. The word gets out quickly and talented prospects will be leery of joining.”

“It’s amazing how just one brilliant jerk can offer a company so much potential but ultimately set it back by doing so much harm,” Burrus says. “Companies that let the behavior fester do so at their own peril.”

About Dr. Katrina Burrus, PhD, MCC

Dr. Katrina Burrus, author of Managing Brilliant Jerks: How Organizations and Coaches Can Transform Difficult Leaders into Powerful Visionaries, has a proven track record coaching numerous international leaders in top organizations like Nestlé, Novartis, United Bank of Switzerland, CERN, the United Nations, and the International Labor Organization. Her coaching career has taken her to Europe, Asia, and the United States. As the founder of MKB Conseil & Coaching in Geneva, Switzerland, and Excellent Executive Coaching, LLC, in Las Vegas, Nevada, she has developed a network of international clients, experts and scholar-practitioners. Dr. Burrus has taught leadership and postgraduate courses at various universities, including a ground-breaking thought leadership workshop titled, Global Nomadic Leadership: Succeeding in a World Without Borders. She teaches executive coaching and has served on the International Coach Federation (ICF) Credentialing Committee.

Jacob Wolinsky is the founder of ValueWalk.com, a popular value investing and hedge fund focused investment website. Jacob worked as an equity analyst first at a micro-cap focused private equity firm, followed by a stint at a smid cap focused research shop. Jacob lives with his wife and four kids in Passaic NJ. - Email: jacob(at)www.valuewalk.com - Twitter username: JacobWolinsky - Full Disclosure: I do not purchase any equities anymore to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest and because at times I may receive grey areas of insider information. I have a few existing holdings from years ago, but I have sold off most of the equities and now only purchase mutual funds and some ETFs. I also own a few grams of Gold and Silver
Previous article Poll: 70% Of Investors Indifferent To Trump’s Covid Diagnosis
Next article What Is An RESP and Why Should You Invest In One

No posts to display