The Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that although advocacy groups were involved in last year’s decision-making process by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding proxy voting adviser policy changes, their actions did not break the law.
Last November, the SEC pleased corporate lobby groups by introducing reforms to proxy voting advisers and shareholder proposal rules widely viewed as anti-shareholder. Several comment letters were said by Bloomberg News to be penned by individuals with ties to lobby groups. The report also noted that a number of the authors denied having written the letters.
Roubaix Capital Outperforms With Small-Cap Stocks; here are their favorites
Roubaix Capital's flagship investment fund declined by 1.19% in the month of September. However, despite this negative monthly performance, the fund returned 15.6% for the year to the end of September, outperforming the S&P 500, which returned just 5.6% over the same period. Roubaix employs a fundamental long/short equity strategy focused on small and mid-cap Read More
The OIG said all of the individuals confirmed they "willingly submitted a letter to the SEC and did not receive any compensation or benefit from anyone for doing so." U.S. chief federal prosecutors were also interested in the investigation but declined to pursue any criminal actions after failing to find any evidence of criminal activity.
What We'll Be Watching For This Week
- How will GMP Capital shareholders vote regarding the amended Richardson GMP transaction at today’s meeting, considering ISS and Glass Lewis have recommended in favor of the deal?
- Will Land & Buildings gain the necessary support of 25% of the outstanding shares of Apartment Investment and Management Company to call a special meeting for a nonbinding vote on its spinoff proposal?
- Has Trian Partners' Nelson Peltz resigned as a senior adviser to Aurora Cannabis in order to seek a board seat at Comcast?
Sunnova Energy International Is "Extremely" Overvalued
A Tuesday report by Spruce Point Capital Management claimed Sunnova Energy International is "extremely" overvalued when accounting for its "undifferentiated business model" and an increasingly competitive landscape. Spruce Point argued the company has "poor and unsustainable economics" masked by management through "potentially misleading" metrics and "aggressive accounting."
The short seller predicted Sunnova Energy would fall as much as 80% to $5 per share once investors take into account the company’s declining fundamentals and took aim at Sunnova Energy’s governance. It said CEO William Berger omitted his five-year stint at failed energy trader Enron from his biography while noting that the company’s chief financial officer worked at two bankrupt energy companies.
Chart Of The Week
So far this year (as of October 2, 2020), globally, 403 companies have been publicly subjected to activist demands by U.S.-based activists, the lowest number since the same period in 2015.