In his latest letter to investors, Mohnish Pabrai warned about the perils of buying stocks at high prices. He explained that it’s possible to overpay for even the market’s most promising companies. Giving Microsoft as an example, Pabrai noted:
"Microsoft had a very strong entrenched monopoly position in most of its markets. It continued to do well after 2000. In fact, its earnings went from $8 billion in 1999 to over $43 billion recently. Unfortunately, as I had predicted, the stock was a dud. From 1999 to 2016, the stock delivered zero returns. It was at $59 a share in 1999 and $59 a share in 2016. But that wasn't the worst of it. By 2009, Microsoft had lost 75% of the value it had in 2000. It was a very bumpy ride with huge drawdowns."This Tiger grand-cub was flat during Q2 but is ready for the return of volatility
Tiger Legatus Master Fund was up 0.1% net for the second quarter, compared to the MSCI World Index's 7.9% return and the S&P 500's 8.5% gain. For the first half of the year, Tiger Legatus is up 9%, while the MSCI World Index has gained 13.3%, and the S&P has returned 15.3%. Q2 2021 hedge Read More
As such, Pabrai isn't willing to take part in the current tech surge. However, he isn't avoiding the sector entirely. According to the most recent 13F filing for is Pabrai Investment Fund, semiconductor company Micron is currently one of the firm's most significant positions.
Mohnish Pabrai on Micron
According to the firm's Q1 2020 13F, Pabrai owned 1.8 million shares in Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) at the end of the first quarter. The position was worth around $76 million at the end of the period.
According to the most recent figures for Pabrai's firm, it had assets under management of around $450 million at the end of the second quarter. Shares in Micron have risen approximately 20% since the 13F report. This indicates the position now accounts for about 20% of assets under management at the value investor's firm.
So far, Pabrai has not gone into detail as to why he decided to buy Micron. And it seems as if he is going to stick to this path for the foreseeable future. When quizzed on the position by a shareholder at the 2019 Pabrai Funds annual meeting, he said, "I would say that I'd be very happy to talk about Micron when we don't own it. Just defer that question for a few years and then we can talk about it."
However, the value investor did provide some information on the tax loss trading he did around the company at the end of 2018.
Specifically, at the 2019 annual meeting, Pabrai said:
"We paid about $38 or $39 a share, which I thought was a great price. And by the 22nd or 23rd of December, it was at about $29 a share. I had three choices. One is to do nothing. The second was to sell Micron and then buy it back in 31 days. Or the third was to sell Micron and buy SK Hynix."
As he explained, SK Hynix was, alongside Micron, one of the three leading players in the memory business. The other one was a Samsung, which was not "really a pure play."
As the investor went on to explain, he decided to pursue the SK trade." It worked out fine," he said.
This suggests that Pabrai entered Micron following his belief that the entire memory sector was undervalued. He's unlikely to ever invest in a sector he does not understand. So, if he bought Micron on valuation alone, it's unlikely he would have then gone on to buy SK. The trade indicates that he knew a lot about the business and want to make the most of his knowledge.
These comments also indicate that while there were other ways to play the sector, Pabrai chose Micron for its value.
Indeed, he has revealed in a recent interview that he discovered the stock while searching through the publication Value Line. He went on to add:
"So I noticed this very low P/E, and then a fund manager friend of mine mentioned that he owned the stock. And so I said, 'Okay, this person isn't exactly an idiot, so why don't I drill down and just see what's going on with Micron?' And when I drilled down, I decided it was worth taking a position."
We can determine from these comments that the fund manager both likes the sector the company operates in and likes the company for the value it offers. It's unlikely he would invest for any other reasons.
Unfortunately, at this point, we don't know his exact reason for building the stake in Micron. With that being the case, all of the above is nothing but speculation.
Still, value investors might be interested in taking a closer look at this memory business.
This article first appeared on ValueWalk Premium.