Dragon Ukranian Property – Vote No At EGM

Dragon Ukranian Property – Vote No At EGM
FotografieLink / Pixabay

Brief post on Dragon Ukranian Property.

I bought this in March 2018 for c18p per share. I had a distribution of .09 USD per share or c 7p. So even if this goes through I am more-or-less flat.  It’s actually worse than that though.  Since I bought this in March 18 my portfolio is up 16%, so this has been a net detractor.

Get The Full Ray Dalio Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Ray Dalio in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues

Q1 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Hedge Fund Launches Jump Despite Equity Market Declines

Last year was a bumper year for hedge fund launches. According to a Hedge Fund Research report released towards the end of March, 614 new funds hit the market in 2021. That was the highest number of launches since 2017, when a record 735 new hedge funds were rolled out to investors. What’s interesting about Read More

The majority shareholder is offering 10p a share.

According to the H1 annual report, this has cash of c $4.9m or $.045 or c3.6p per share. The stake in Arricano is potentially worth $3m.

NAV is $36m.  No debt, they are offering c$13.5m.

If I need to spell it out for you, this is not a good deal.

Dragon Ukranian Property: An Illiquid Stock

They say it is to save c£240k a year in costs. And that the stock is illiquid.  I would rather lose $240k per year than over half the NAV! I knew it was illiquid going in.

Not keen to hold an unlisted Ukranian company so, if the vote passes I will likely sell.  This could have been far worse, but I think it tarnishes the reputation of Mark Iwashko (director), Aloysius Wilhelmus Johannes van der Heijden (Non-executive director) and in particular Tomas Fiala. Dragon Capital could easily have made a fair offer – say 15-20p a share and still made money on this. Remember they are only buying 40% of the shares.  The fact that they didn’t make a fairer offer, to me, indicates they are not people one should look to do business with in future.

The board should not have approved this. The non-execs should have made Dragon capital formally requisition a meeting. This would stand up for the long-suffering minorities such as myself !

To vote No on the delisting you need to get your broker to fill out a form of proxy – do it now if you can. I believe the failiure of the company to allow voting via CREST shows the weakness of minority protection in the UK – clearly all shareholders should be allowed to vote in the easiest way possible, particular given the corona circumstances.

There is a possibility that the vote on this could fail.  Remember they only own 60% of the shares so your vote is not futile.

Article by Rob Mahan, Deep Value Investment Blog

Updated on

No posts to display