Below is a statement from Ropes & Gray tax & benefits partner Josh Lichtenstein on the Supreme Court’s decision on Intel vs Sulyma.
The Justices ruled that employers can’t shorten the window 401(k) participants have to sue over alleged plan mismanagement by simply posting plan information online or sending disclosures in the mail.
Peter Lynch was one of the best growth investors of all time. As the Magellan Fund manager at Fidelity Investments between 1977 and 1990, he averaged a 29.2% annual return. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more The fund manager's investment strategy was straightforward. He wanted to find growth companies and sit on them Read More
Statement on Intel vs Sulyma
“The Intel vs Sulyma decision has made it clear that the full six-year statute of limitations under ERISA will apply to claims by 401(k) participants against plan sponsors in more circumstances, and on a nationwide basis. This decision will make it harder for plan sponsors to limit their liability for 401(k) investment menu design decisions, and it may add further momentum to the ongoing wave of fiduciary breach and fee litigation class actions that have already resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements from plan sponsors.
The decision will be especially impactful for plan sponsors located in circuits that have traditionally been more willing to limit the period for damages to three years, and who may find themselves more likely to be targeted by class action suits in the future. This decision is also noteworthy because it will allow the lower courts to assess the underlying question of whether Intel acted prudently when it decided to include alternative investments (such as hedge funds and private equity funds) in its plans.”
- Ropes & Gray tax & benefits partner Josh Lichtenstein
What do you think about the ruling? Let us know in the comments section by sounding off below.