CAIR Files Recommendations for Fixing Unconstitutional Terror Watchlist

CAIR Files Recommendations with Federal Judge for Fixing Unconstitutional Terror Watchlist

Terror Watchlist

Olgaozik / Pixabay

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 10/28/19) – The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, on Friday filed its arguments on how to fix the terror watchlist after a federal judge ruled that list unconstitutional last month.

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q3 2019 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

In September, Judge Anthony Trenga of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that the government has unconstitutionally failed to provide watchlisted persons with notice and an opportunity for individuals to challenge their status. The judge granted CAIR’s motion for summary judgment in the case of 23 American Muslims who were unjustly labeled as suspected terrorists by their government, causing extensive harm to their families, careers, and ability to travel. Judge Trenga ordered CAIR to submit arguments about how to fix the constitutional problems with the watchlist.

SEEJudge Trenga’s Opinion

SEE: The FBI’s terrorism watch list violates the Constitution, federal judge says

Lawyers for CAIR focused their recommendations on two areas: the standard for adding an individual to the watchlist and the due process rights of individuals so listed.

SEE: CAIR’s Recommendations

First, CAIR recommended the specific inclusion standards be disclosed to give the public fair notice of what behavior might land them on the watchlist. They also argued that the current inclusion standard of “reasonable suspicion” that a person is a “suspected terrorist” is unconstitutional and should be narrowed to reasonable suspicion of “criminal activity” that is “ongoing or imminent.”

Second, CAIR’s attorneys argued that individuals placed on the watchlist must be given notice of their placement on the list and the evidence and criteria used to do so. These individuals must also have the ability to challenge their listing status before a neutral arbiter.

“When an American citizen breaks the law, they have both a clear understanding of the law they have allegedly broken and the opportunity to challenge the charges at a trial with a neutral jury of their peers,” said CAIR Senior Litigation Attorney Gadeir Abbas. “A person on the watchlist has neither of those basic constitutional rights. Imagine studying Arabic abroad and then finding yourself on the watchlist with no way to get off. This is not a hypothetical, it is actually happening to American citizens and it is absolutely unconstitutional and must be changed.”

CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to enhance understanding of Islam, protect civil rights, promote justice, and empower American Muslims.

La mision de CAIR es proteger las libertades civiles, mejorar la comprensión del Islam, promover la justicia, y empoderar a los musulmanes en los Estados Unidos.



About the Author

Anna Peel
Anna Peel is a professional writer. In the past four years, she has written for many websites including BSC Kids, Wasabi Media Group, Boomtron, and many others. She currently live in Savannah, Georgia and occasionally blogs about fashion during her free time.