Democrats promise to repeal Obamacare, and abolish Medicare

Democrats promise to repeal Obamacare, and abolish Medicare
<a href="">Parentingupstream</a> / Pixabay

It was the Republicans who got elected on the promise to “repeal and replace” Obamacare. They didn’t do it, and they blamed the Democrats.

Who’d have thought that the Democrats might just get it done-quietly.

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q2 hedge fund letters, conference, scoops etc

Carlson Capital Thinks The SPAC Boom May Be Over [Q1 Letter]

Black DiamondCarlson Capital's Black Diamond Arbitrage Partners fund added 1.3% net fees in the first quarter of 2021, according to a copy of the firm's March 2021 investor update, which ValueWalk has been able to review. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more At the end of the quarter, merger arbitrage investments represented 89% of Read More

"Medicare for All" would replace everything, including the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare), Medicare, and Medicaid.  Although "single payer" might have been Obama's ultimate objective, the ACA is based on retaining private insurance. A "public option" was proposed and discarded.

The main difference among Democratic candidates is how quickly private insurance and private payment would be eliminated - or crowded out.

Medicare for seniors eliminated alternatives very early, in order to assure the success of the program. It is unlawful to sell policies duplicating Medicare benefits; seniors can only buy supplemental or “Medigap policies.” Medicare-for-All proposals would extend this restriction to all.

While the universal program would still be called “Medicare,” the Medicare Trust Funds would be absorbed into the Universal Medicare Trust Fund. In essence, Medicare for All would amount to Medicare for Nobody.

The Mercatus Center estimates that the proposed program would be only 40 percent funded using existing resources-Medicare, Medicaid, ACA subsidies, and tax subsidies for employer-owned insurance.  This would transfer seniors into a program with even less security than the Trust Funds, which are projected to be bankrupt within several years, according to Chris Jacobs in his new book, The Case against Single Payer.

For further information, see the October issue of AAPS News.

Previous article Top 10 low-stress jobs that pay well: A healthy work-life balance
Next article A powerful profanity filter service to catch offensive content
Jacob Wolinsky is the founder of, a popular value investing and hedge fund focused investment website. Jacob worked as an equity analyst first at a micro-cap focused private equity firm, followed by a stint at a smid cap focused research shop. Jacob lives with his wife and four kids in Passaic NJ. - Email: jacob(at) - Twitter username: JacobWolinsky - Full Disclosure: I do not purchase any equities anymore to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest and because at times I may receive grey areas of insider information. I have a few existing holdings from years ago, but I have sold off most of the equities and now only purchase mutual funds and some ETFs. I also own a few grams of Gold and Silver

No posts to display