Getting Ready For ICE Raids Beginning After July 4th

Getting Ready For ICE Raids Beginning After July 4th
geralt / Pixabay

Getting Ready For ICE Raids Beginning After July 4th; Dispute Over How Vulnerable Populations Can Best Protect Their Families 

WASHINGTON, D.C.  (July 3, 2019) –  In the wake of President Donald Trump‘s threat that ICE agents will begin raids to find and deport illegal aliens beginning after July 4th, vulnerable families have been given advice from well meaning advocacy groups, but that advice is being questioned by public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q2 hedge fund letters, conference, scoops etc

Q1 2021 13F Round-Up: Notable Hedge Fund Changes

investBelow is our 13F roundup for some high profile hedge funds for the three months to the end of March 2021 (Q1). Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more The statements only include equity positions as 13Fs do not include cash and debt holdings. They also only include US equity holdings. Funds may hold Read More

In the wake of President Trump's warning that ICE will begin deporting millions of illegal immigrants after Independence Day, organizations opposing such tactics are providing advice to those who might be targeted, but stronger and better warnings might be more effective, and there are also additional steps which might be taken, suggests Professor Banzhaf.

For example, some advocacy groups are suggesting that, if agents come to the door demanding entry and claim to have a warrant, residents inside should ask that the document be slipped under the door for their inspection.  But, in most cases, ICE officials will have only a legalistic administrative deportation order which does not require that they be granted entry, rather than an arrest warrant signed by a judge which, to be valid, must contain the suspect's correct name, address, and date of birth.

Asking people who are terrified of deportation, not legally sophisticated, and who might have only limited fluency in English (much less legalize) to tell the difference between a mere deportation order and a valid arrest warrant, especially if ICE agents misrepresent the document, may not be very effective, and could jeopardize their rights and lead to deportations, he warns.

Since ICE agents have reportedly been known to use many ruses to gain entry - e.g., saying they are looking for a friend, searching for witnesses, or even representing themselves as police, etc. - advocacy groups might consider advising at-risk families to remain silent and refuse to converse with anyone who comes to their door seeking entry, regardless of who they claim to be or what documents they claim to have, argues Banzhaf.

To avoid misunderstandings and misrepresentations, advocacy groups might also explain to vulnerable populations how they can and should use their cell phones, not only to record whatever agents might shout through the door in seeking to obtain entry, but also how to insure that such audio recordings are sent in real time to at least one alternative storage location (e.g., in the cloud, to a server maintained for that purpose, or even to a friend, etc.) in case the phone with this vital recording is seized, damaged, or otherwise cannot be used if the legality of any entry is later challenged in court.

Asking at-risk populations to send an instant message containing their location to an advocacy group if they are visited by ICE agents, and/or observe ICE agents visiting neighbors, might  help these groups keep track of the agents' location and possible targets, and even make it possible for members of the group to arrive on the scene to make video recordings of what occurs.

Whether or not individuals agree with Trump's new deportation mandate and program, everyone should agree that, if it is carried out, the legal rights of all affected must be protected.

This is especially true of lawyers, since they are dedicated to protecting the rights of all Americans, says Banzhaf.


Professor of Public Interest Law

George Washington University Law School,

FAMRI Dr. William Cahan Distinguished Professor,

Fellow, World Technology Network,

Founder, Action on Smoking and Health (ASH),

2000 H Street, NW, Wash, DC 20052, USA

(202) 994-7229 // (703) 527-8418  @profbanzhaf

No posts to display