NCLA Responds To SCOTUS Decision To Keep ‘Auer Deference’

Today the Supreme Court refused to overturn ‘Auer deference’ in Kisor v. Wilkie, a case that could have broad ramifications for federal agencies. NCLA filed an amicus curiae brief in January before the U.S. Supreme Court explaining how Auer deference blatantly violates the Constitution in two separate ways.

Digital Divide

Activedia / Pixabay

First, Auer requires judges to abandon their duty of indepen­dent judgment, in violation of Article III and the judicial oath. Second, Auer violates the Due Process Clause by commanding judges to exhibit bias in favor of the legal positions of administrative agencies—even when those agencies are litigants before the court. And, of course, displaying bias in favor of the government also entails showing bias against whoever is litigating against the government agency, thereby depriving that litigant of due process.

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q1 hedge fund letters, conference, scoops etc

NCLA Statement on SCOTUS Decision to keep 'Auer deference':

“NCLA is disappointed, but not shocked, that the Supreme Court failed to overturn Auer deference today. More surprising is that the majority still refuses to engage squarely with the two most fundamental constitutional objections to Auer deference, objections that NCLA brought to the Court's attention. First, deferring to a government agency's interpretation of a regulation violates due process, because it denies one of the litigants before the court a fair hearing.  Second, when a judge defers in such a manner, he or she fails to live up to the judge's Article III duty to provide independent judgment.  We hope that the Court will eventually come to grips with these constitutional objections and strike down Auer for good." - Mark Chenoweth, Executive Director & General Counsel, NCLA

About NCLA 

NCLA is a nonprofit civil rights organization founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights. For more information visit us online:

About the Author

Jacob Wolinsky
Jacob Wolinsky is the founder of, a popular value investing and hedge fund focused investment website. Prior to ValueWalk, Jacob was VP of Business Development at SumZero. Prior to SumZero, Jacob worked as an equity analyst first at a micro-cap focused private equity firm, followed by a stint at a smid cap focused research shop. Jacob lives with his wife and four kids in Passaic NJ. - Email: jacob(at) - Twitter username: JacobWolinsky - Full Disclosure: I do not purchase any equities anymore to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest and because at times I may receive grey areas of insider information. I have a few existing holdings from years ago, but I have sold off most of the equities and now only purchase mutual funds and some ETFs. I also own a few grams of Gold and Silver