The question is a bit of a misnomer. Economic growth was much stronger during, for example, the wild, wild west days. But, is Trump the best economic growth president in the modern era (i.e. since 1980?)? The IMF seems to think so.
How could one tell that the IMF thinks this? Well, look at what their growth forecasts are for Trump, and compare to growth figures for the first year of other U.S. presidents.
Before looking, which presidents would you guess show up on top? Trump is on top, but who follows? Would you guess President Clinton or perhaps President Reagan? They both had amazing periods of economic growth, but did their first year beat others?
Mohnish Pabrai: 6.5x Return On Deep Value Turkish Stock [2020 Letter]
In his year-end letter to investors, Mohnish Pabrai, the Managing Partner of Pabrai Investment Funds, explained that 2020 had more impact on his way of thinking about the market than any other year since 1999. Q4 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Following last year's lessons, Pabrai explained he has decided to move away Read More
Here’s a look at the results. What the figure is showing is the average difference in growth across all countries for the first year of U.S. presidents going back to 1980.
As stated, the IMF must be thinking that Trump is the best president for economic growth. In fact, Trump is the only president with a positive first year difference.
Overall, growth for Trump’s first year was 0.12 percent higher than growth in the prior year.
Which president comes in second? President Ronald Reagan comes in second, with a growth of -0.05 percent. The -0.05 percent means that average economic growth during Reagan’s first year in office was 0.05 percent lower than what it was the year before he came into office.
In third and fourth places are presidents Clinton and the first president Bush. Both had growth differences of -0.13 percent.
In fifth place is the second president Bush at -0.16 percent.
The worst president for economic growth? President Obama. The difference between economic growth prior to his first year in office and his first year in office was a massive -0.49 percent.
Perhaps Prior Year Growth Explains the Difference?
One criticism might be what the prior year’s growth measure was.
Interestingly, the econometrics don’t disprove the “Trump Effect”.
The following is a random effects panel regression. The predicted variable is the growth differential from the prior year for the first year of a president’s administration. The variables predicting the difference are the prior year’s economic growth measure and indicators for who the president was or is.
Interestingly, after controlling for the prior year’s growth, the results still stand. For some reason, the Trump effect still stands.
In looking at growth during the first year of a new presidential administration, President Trump comes out on top, by a large margin. The “Trump Effect” holds even after controlling for countries’ prior years’ growth rates. Interesting.