President Vladimir Putin’s Russia is not inward looking but very much outward looking and has clearly shown its intentions to exert in its near abroad. Near Abroad is an official terminology used in military, political and economic doctrines of the Russian state, its meaning is the rightful sphere of influence of Russia in the surrounding regions which culturally and politically belonged to the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. And Afghanistan is next to Near Abroad and historically a country Russians have always vowed to control with certain parts of the Russian State Establishment even considering it as an extended Near Abroad.
In September 2015, a meeting was held between the former leader of the Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansoor and Russian President Vladimir Putin with the agenda being potential cooperation. Putin unofficially met with Mullah Akhtar Mansur at a military base in Tajikistan, and this meeting received very minimal publicity in the mainstream media. According to some reports, its purpose was to discuss bilateral cooperation in the fight against the Daesh which is gaining influence in Afghanistan. Since then Russian State Establishment has gone on expanding contacts with the Taliban and they want to achieve the following objectives:.
First, while maintaining ties with the Taliban, Russia reminds the West of the inadmissibility of ignoring Moscow’s interests in the discussion of plans relating to Afghanistan at regional and international platforms. In January 2016, in order to advance the peace process in Afghanistan, a Quadripartite Coordination Group (QCG) was formed, which included the United States, China, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Four participating countries held meetings concerning negotiations with the Taliban. Russia felt isolated, although the efforts of QCG ultimately did not lead to success.
Exclusive: David Einhorn’s FOF Has 270% Return From Revenue Share Agreement [In-Depth]
Greenlight Masters, the fund of funds managed by David Einhorn, returned 26.2% net of fees in 2020, outperforming the S&P 500, which returned 18.4% throughout the year. Q4 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more According to a copy of the firm's letter, which ValueWalk has been able to review, the dispersion of returns in Read More
Secondly, while supporting the Taliban, the Russian political leadership seeks to strengthen the barriers which halt spreading of US and NATO influence in the region. Since 2001, more than 3 thousand US troops have died in Afghanistan fighting against the Taliban and Al Qaeda. In addition to active participation in the Middle Eastern processes, Moscow also intends to expand its influence beyond Central Asia, including inside Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Thirdly, Russia feels the threat posed by the influence of Daesh in Afghanistan. Since 2014, Daesh has been increasing its influence on the territory of Afghanistan, which, as the Kremlin fears, may lead to its expansion, including in the north, to the countries of Central Asia and to Russia itself. The Taliban and Daesh have been fighting each other, so Russia found it necessary to extend a helping hand to the Taliban.
In December 2017, the Russian Foreign Ministry officially and publically announced that Moscow was exchanging intelligence information with the Taliban in the framework of military operations against the Daesh. The experience of Russia’s regional cooperation with Iran and Turkey in the Syrian settlement, which brought some success, suggests that Moscow can try to apply this approach in Afghanistan, involving Iran in joint actions.
Fourth, another headache for Moscow is Afghan opium. Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the total illegal drugs in the world, which are mainly produced in the territories controlled by the Taliban. Drug producers in Afghanistan look at Russia as one of the largest markets in the world. Every year, the illegal use of narcotic drugs kills 70 thousand people in Russia. Thus, the leadership in Moscow believes that in the fight against drugs the Taliban can be a better partner than the national unity government of Afghanistan.
The Russian support of the Taliban will have numerous consequences for the future of Afghanistan. It will weaken the authority of the central government in Kabul, which as a result will lead to the creation in Afghanistan of the situation that already exists in Syria. However, while in Syria Russia supports the government of President Bashar al-Assad, in Afghanistan, supporting the Taliban, Moscow will limit the power of American sponsored government in Kabul.
There is also a larger goal of achieving international consensus – the exclusion of the US from the processes which lead to conflict resolution in Afghanistan. This is one more incentive for Moscow’s ties with the Taliban, achieving an international consensus on Moscow’s strategy aimed at selective interaction with the Taliban will strengthen Russia’s international status as a mediator in conflict resolution at the expense of the US. Since December 2016, Russia has been holding regular diplomatic negotiations to resolve the political crisis in Afghanistan. Among other things, these talks call for moderate Taliban groups to participate in peace talks with the Afghan government.
The US refuses to participate in these negotiations because of its reluctance to maintain diplomatic relations with the Taliban. However, the expansion of these negotiations from the tripartite summit of Russia, China and Pakistan in December 2016 to the forum of 11 states in April 2017 with the participation of representatives of Central Asian countries, Iran, India and Afghanistan shows that the selective strategy of cooperation developed by Moscow with the Taliban movement has weight age and finds recognition from regional partners .
European leaders are reluctant to agree to a diplomatic dialogue with the Taliban as well, but pro-Russian Afghan politicians pay attention to the relationship between the strategies for engagement with the Taliban, which the countries of Europe and Russia adhere to. Former pro-Kremlin President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai said in April 2017 that Norway and Germany have been negotiating with the Taliban for many years, and criticizing Russia’s relations with the Taliban from the West, he said, is a manifestation of double standards.
The precedent already exists. Since the US conducted secret talks with the Taliban in 2012, Russian politicians believe that under the influence of international pressure and in the absence of active military operations in Afghanistan, Washington can return to the strategies of interaction again in the Trump presidency like his predecessor Obama.
If the United States follows the example of Russia and recognizes the need to maintain diplomatic relations with the Taliban, then the international community’s representation of Russia as a great power will increase significantly. Moscow’s response to international crises, such as those involving Syria, Afghanistan and North Korea, is aimed at turning Russia into a counterweight to the United States. This indicates that in the pursuit of this status, the success or failure of Moscow’s interaction with the Taliban is associated with serious consequences.
In short, Russia’s selective interaction with moderate members of the Taliban movement casts doubt on US negotiating strategies for this Afghan militant organization. And Russian politicians, promoting a peaceful settlement in Afghanistan and gaining international recognition through their diplomatic interaction with the Taliban, can help strengthen the status of Russia again as a great power and an indispensable intermediary in resolving crisis situations and conflicts around the world.
Article by Shaikh Muhammad Bilal
Shaikh Muhammad Bilal is a freelance journalist