Why “Expert Opinions” So Often Are Dead Wrong

Manned flight is impossible.  Computers will never be smaller than a house. Space flight is “utter bilge.” The food pyramid.

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Check out our H2 hedge fund letters here.

One doesn’t have to look far to find embarrassing, peer-reviewed, max-credentialed, decades-held-as-orthodoxy proclamations by the most respected experts in the world.

#MICUS: Value Managers Say Their Style Is Far From Over

Structured ValueNote of Chuck Bath, David Wallack, and Ramona Persaud's presentation from the 2020 Morningstar Investment Conference. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Dead Again? Value Managers Say Their Style Is Far From Over For more than a decade, large value has been one of the most difficult factors to own. Moderator Linda Abu Read More


Every single successful business idea or invention heard orders of magnitude more of “Not interested,” “No,” “It’s doomed to fail,” or “It’s impossible,” than “Yes.”

Usually, the greater the paper, “official” expertise, the more likely to be wrong about the future. All that purchased prestige is backward looking. Conferred by mostly stagnating bodies on those who’ve mastered and regurgitated the past with the most accuracy. It’s not surprising that experts on the past, frozen in time and protective of their rear-view knowledge, would be most confidently blind to the possibilities of the future.

Does this mean expertise is a meaningless concept?

Of course not. It’s tremendously useful. Especially when two conditions hold:

  1. It’s earned by the value of outcomes produced
  2. It’s accountable to the ever-changing market

The more it’s earned by politicking, rule-following, Inner Ring seeking, and “paying dues,” the less trustworthy. The less directly accountable to the right-now and shifting market—the more protected via subsidies, cult-like yes-man status, and competition killing—the less trustworthy.

Knowledge about what is and what works as demonstrated in practice is a sounder place to seek expertise than theoretical knowledge about what might or might not be possible. I’d trust a mother of four’s expertise on the experience of childbirth more than a medical professional who’s studied birth but never been there live, let alone given birth. Especially if that professional earned their accolades by sucking up to the stuffy status quo, protected from profit and loss signals, and automatically assumed to be right in the popular imagination.

Wherever possible, look for outcomes over opinions, and market accountability over stagnant status.

Reprinted from the author's blog.

Isaac M. Morehouse


Isaac M. Morehouse

Isaac Morehouse is the founder and CEO of Praxis. He is a member of the FEE Faculty Network. He blogs at IsaacMorehouse.com.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.