Year-to-date the energy sector is the worst performing sector in the developed markets. In the tables below, I highlight statistics from our Knowledge Leaders Selection Universe (KLSU) which captures the top 85% of market cap in the developed and emerging markets. The KLSU DM Energy sector is down 9.05% YTD, making it the worst performing sector in the developed world. Breadth has been fairly negative over the last 200 days, with only 43% of energy companies above the moving average. While the defensive utility, telecom and real estate sectors have the worst breadth in the developed markets YTD, energy is the weakest cyclical sector.
KLSU Developed World Sectors (USD)
At this year's Sohn Investment Conference, Dan Sundheim, the founder and CIO of D1 Capital Partners, spoke with John Collison, the co-founder of Stripe. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more D1 manages $20 billion. Of this, $10 billion is invested in fast-growing private businesses such as Stripe. Stripe is currently valued at around Read More
Interestingly, the KLSU EM Energy sector is not only the best performing sector in the emerging markets, it is also the best performing region/sector in the combined all country world. Its lead is rather significant, outpacing the next closest sector by over 4.5%. It is also the sector with the best breadth in either the developed or emerging markets, with 79% of EM energy stocks above the 200-day moving average.
KLSU Emerging Market Sectors (USD)
This bifurcation is difficult to explain given that the relative performance of both the DM and EM energy sector is highly correlated to oil prices. The KLSU DM Energy sector’s relative performance is 93% correlated with oil prices. After a good relative performance year in 2016, the DM energy sector retreated in 2017 and is now testing relative performance lows again. A successful test of lows should be interpreted as a bullish signal.
The EM Energy sector’s relative performance has a slightly higher correlation to oil prices.
It is important to remember the big picture here. Commodity prices are as cheap relative to stock prices as they have ever been. In the chart below, I show the relative performance of the GSCI Commodity Index relative to the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the trailing 100 years. Commodities have historically made three major lows relative to stocks and appear to be making the fourth. The first low was at the peak of the Roaring Twenties stock market boom in 1929 where auto and radio stocks soared. The second low was in the early 1970s after Nixon severed the US Dollar link to gold when the Nifty-Fifty stocks were the rage. The third low was at the peak of the internet bubble in the late 1990s. Each of these periods were preceded by a decade (1920s, 1960s and 1990s) of huge credit expansion that boosted equity prices to unsustainable levels.
We are currently experiencing the fourth major low in commodities relative to equites. We clearly have had a decade of easy financial conditions and massive credit expansion leading to elevated equity valuations. In each peak equity phase (1929, 1973, 1999) there were new ways invented to justify equity valuations which we also seem to be re-running as well. Just like price-to-click was a poor defense of technology valuations in 1999, hearing the justification of the fundamental value of Bitcoin seems eerily similar.
With this big picture in mind, seeing DM energy stocks test their relative lows makes for an interesting opportunity. These kind of lows only come around once a generation.
Article by Steven Vannelli, CFA – Knowledge Leaders Capital