All traders share an aspiration to borrow OPM and most of them, one day, will trade with money they aren’t eligible. Noble fell very young in the powder pot.
“Noble said the lower than expected sale price for its gas and power assets reflected the conversion of working capital into cash and a revaluation of trading positions due to “market volatility”.
Trident Fund LP February 2021 Performance Update
Trident Fund LP performance update for the month ended February 2021. Q4 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Trident Fund LP Performance The Trident Fund LP returned 6.1 percent in February, and the fund is -0.5 percent net for 2021. In February, Trident profited from rising interest rates and commodity prices to regain losses sustained Read More
“Mercuria had paid $102m for the business and deposited a further $83m in an escrow account”.
“That figure is much less than the $261m Noble estimated it would be paid for the business last month when it asked shareholders to approve the sale”.
- The conversion of working capital to cash assets is the portion attributed to the Gas/power unit on Noble Group Q3’s consolidated Balance sheet, Statements of Cash-Flows and Income statement.
- $76,000,000 of Noble Gas & Power valuation was the working capital attributed to third parties or Banks (payables finance, inventory finance, receivables finance).
- Mercuria has paid the agreed price on the BUs to the seller minus this reverse-supplied capital by third-parties e.g restating the sales and actual P&L of Noble Gas & Power.
The unit was marked by Noble at $394M in 1H-2017.
- The $185M paid by Mercuria for Noble Gas & Power also suggests that Noble self-estimated the BU at more than twice its net asset value.
“Under a deal agreed in the past couple of weeks, Mercuria has given Noble access to $400m of its unutilised credit lines in return for a fee and information about its trading positions in coal and iron ore, according to people with knowledge of the arrangement.”
To avoid confusion, Mercuria isn’t altruistically given access but is tentatively placing the deal externally for a 200-250bps fee, contingent to 80/20 banks money and two leveraged funds money-without any risk or fiduciary relationship to the related parties we muse.
These funds are not first-payee loss in the case of a total loss / get whacked.
(EFA and Inoks Capital) target 1000-1200bps net returns in Asia trade finance coveting borrowers who do not have a credit rating / or that banks just don’t want as clients (the rotten fish).
Cost of capital is cheap, albeit distorted by low rates.
Noble Group is the perfect designated candidate some would argue: has destroyed its credits and its WACC represents the best uncorrelated opportunity on a risk-adjusted basis.
(Except for two minor details).
- The counterparty in the transaction contemplated by the funds doesn’t trade for a profit.
- Doesn’t generate cash as the banks unwinding the counterparty’s balance sheet.
We think concerned investors would like to develop a discussion with their private wealth advisers.
Among other things EFA and INOKS disclose little of the break-down of their funds other than a monthly return or geographies. This is perhaps the main “informational advantage” that the “trade finance funds” have.
The Noble Files ????