With the latest smartphone contender having been released, now is the ideal time to make a Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X comparison. Ultimately, Google is attempting to enter the upper echelons of the smartphone marketplace, and knock the likes of Apple off its perch. This will be extremely challenging when up against an iPhone X release that is one of the most impressive mobiles that Apple has released the many years. So does the Google Pixel 2 or the Apple iPhone X come out on top?
Firstly, the Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X battle begins in the field of design, with the size of the two devices being particularly interesting. It must be said that Apple has really won out here, as the iPhone X is almost exactly the same size, and even marginally smaller, than the Google Pixel 2, yet has a much larger display.
The dimensions of the Google Pixel 2 are 145.7 x 69.7 x 7.8 mm (5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 in), whereas the iPhone X measures 143.6 x 70.9 x 7.7 mm (5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 in).
However, it is notable that the iPhone X is significantly heavier than the Google Pixel 2; 31g to be precise. The iPhone X weighs in at 174g, whereas the Google smartphone will weigh 143g when it is released.
This disparity in weight can be partly attributed to the additional screen real estate included in the iPhone X. The OLED panel in the Apple smartphone measures 5.8-inches, which is nearly 20% larger than the five-inch display included in the Google Pixel 2.
Another key area for comparison in the Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X battle is the resolution of the two devices. Apple would be particularly keen that attention is paid to this aspect of the iPhone X, as it has increased the resolution of this smartphone above full HD; the first time this has occurred in an Apple mobile.
Thus, the iPhone X is capable of displaying 1,125 x 2,436 pixels (~458 ppi pixel density), which means that it is clearly superior to the full HD Google Pixel 2, which can display 1,080 x 1,920 pixels (~441 ppi pixel density).
Dust and waterproofing
Both of these devices are IP67 certified, meaning that they offer both decent dust and waterproofing.
The processor to be included in these two devices is clearly a critical aspect of the Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X comparison. Google has armed its a device with an octa-core setup (4×2.35 GHz Kryo & 4×1.9 GHz Kryo), which should perform extremely capably. With Apple moving to a hexa-core processor for the first time with the iPhone X, this is undoubtedly the most powerful smartphone that the corporation has ever produced, although precise gigahertz information has not been released.
But two Monsoon and four Mistral cores will be included in the iPhone X when it is released in November.
Apple has never been overly keen on including a huge amount of memory in its smartphone contenders, and thus the 3GB of RAM included in the iPhone X represents a freezing from the iPhone 7 Plus. Google has thus outdone Apple in this department, ensuring that the Google Pixel 2 is provided with 4GB of RAM memory.
However, the unique combination of proprietary software and hardware in the iPhone X means that this smartphone is a more than capable performer.
It is perhaps a little surprising that Google is yet to embrace a 256GB version of the Google Pixel range, as this is the maximum storage quantity available in the iPhone X series. The Google Pixel 2 has a maximum storage quantity of 128GB, while neither device has embraced the micro SD card technology that is beloved of Samsung.
To all intents and purposes, these two devices have identical battery provisions. To be pedantic, the iPhone X has an incredibly slightly larger cell included, with the premium Apple smartphone benefiting from a 2,716 mAh unit. Considering that the battery included in the Google Pixel 2 is measured at 2,700 mAh, there is an extremely negligible difference between the two devices.
Comparing camera provisions was always going to be a key aspect of the Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X battle, and it is thus informative to list the basic specifications of the two devices in this department.
Google Pixel 2 – 12.2 MP, f/1.8, OIS, phase detection & laser autofocus, dual-LED flash.
iPhone X – dual 12 MP, f/1.8 & f/2.4, phase detection autofocus, OIS, 2x optical zoom, quad-LED (dual tone) flash.
There is absolutely no doubt that Apple is the winner here, as Google has decided against including a dual-lens in its flagship smartphone. This will be very disappointing for floating smartphone consumers, and could dissuade people from purchasing the Pixel 2.
Finally, pricing is a key front in the Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X war, and the mega-corporation will be only too keen to emphasize how much more affordable the Pixel 2 is than its Apple counterpart. With the iPhone X retailing in the $1,000 dollar ballpark, the Google Pixel 2 will go on sale at a rather affordable $649.
Certainly smartphone purchasers on a budget are likely to opt for the Google handset.
When making the Google Pixel 2 vs iPhone X comparison, it is important to note that the Google smartphone is far cheaper than the Apple offering. Ultimately, considering the price disparity between the two devices, it is entirely understandable that the iPhone X outperforms the Google Pixel 2. The specs of this Apple handset are superior in the vast majority of departments, and coupled with the combination of proprietary hardware and software, this makes the iPhone X an attractive purchase.
But the Google Pixel 2 certainly delivers value for money, and will no doubt attract many consumers on a budget.