Wharton’s Ken Moon discusses his research on retail pricing.
If you’re a frequent online shopper, you already know you’re being watched. Companies collect reams of data based on your browsing and purchasing patterns. There’s so much data, in fact, that it’s easy to get lost in the numbers. That’s where Ken Moon comes in. A professor of operations, information and decisions at Wharton, Moon is researching how retailers can use online data to create effective pricing policies. He visited with [email protected] to discuss his paper, “Randomized Markdowns and Online Monitoring,” which was co-authored with Kostas Bimpikis and Haim Mendelson of Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business.
An edited transcript of the conversation follows.
According to a recent interview, Corsair Capital's founder Jay Petschek did not plan to be a hedge fund manager. After holding various roles on Wall Street, Petschek decided to launch the fund in January 1991, when his family and friends were asking him to buy equities on their behalf. He realized the best structure for Read More
[email protected]: Could you give us a summary of your research?
Ken Moon: I do research in empirical operations. That means two things: I work with data, sometimes in collaboration with companies, hospitals or marketplaces. And I’m really trying to be prescriptive about decision-making in my research. In this particular project, we worked with a retailer that is active online. It was a very detailed, customer-level data set. What’s interesting about it is that you can track a single customer both online and offline. For instance, if the customer today were to go on his or her phone, look at a product, go to a computer tomorrow, look at it, and then walk into a store another day and buy it, we would be able to track all of those things. It really opened up a lot of avenues to explore.
One thing that’s very interesting about this particular project was that we were able to look at a very information-rich environment in a way that we see in our everyday lives. If we think a product that we’re interested in might drop in price, we can check our smartphone. It’s also the case now that these companies can track all of this information at a very individual level. For both sides, it’s a very information-rich environment. It’s very interesting to think about how that affects the decisions of companies that are active in this space and how it affects outcomes for customers and consumers.
[email protected]: When you were looking at this data set, what did you find about price monitoring?
Moon: I think one broad takeaway is that information seems to matter. You do have customers who are very intensive in their monitoring. They’re typically the more price-sensitive customers. But also, their opportunity cost to be doing this sort of monitoring is very low, so they are going to be checking very often. Your most price-insensitive customers are not checking very often. It’s about every 20 days, on average, between visits. It’s a very big difference in terms of how these consumers are able to access information, even from this very ubiquitous channel. And it makes a big difference in terms of outcomes as well.
[email protected]: Is there a clear indication of how companies should be playing with price based on how someone is monitoring price?
Moon: Those are exactly some of the issues that we wanted to explore in this research. One of the interesting things that we found is that, even in this very informationally rich space, sometimes very simple policies and very simple decisions can be very effective. You can capture most of the value as a firm.
To give an example, the retailer that we worked with follows a very simple pricing policy. For each product, you’re going to start at a certain price, a list price. Then at a certain point in time during a season, you drop the price down to its sale price, which is a very predictable percentage of that initial list price. Finally, you move to another predictable price, a clearance price, where you’re trying to just get the products off the shelves.
What’s interesting there is that the consumers understand what prices they’ll see. It’s very predictable. But all the retailer did was to make the timing of those markdowns unpredictable. By doing something very simple like that, it really exacerbated the informational asymmetry in terms of the cost of monitoring. Those customers who were price-insensitive, for whom it was very costly to be monitoring often, were the ones who couldn’t take advantage of a markdown when it happened. They understood that, so they would buy earlier. There is an interesting aspect there where this sort of pricing has an allocative role. You’re deciding who buys at what price.
[email protected]: It seems like more companies have moved toward unpredictable pricing. There used to be the price, then it went on sale, then it went on clearance. Now it seems that items could be 50% off one day, 30% off the next day, or it could be full price and then 50% again. Is that unpredictable strategy hurting retailers?
Moon: I think it depends on the market. In this sort of setting, we find that being predictable, being simple but also having some degree of flexibility, is actually the right way to go. You are capturing, from the first perspective, most of that value. If you think about an industry where that sort of quickly changing pricing has been very successful, an example might be the airline industry. You might be on a plane, and you sit next to someone who’s paid a very different price for the same ticket. I’m pretty price-sensitive, so I might have bought a cheaper ticket.
“They almost think of the customer sort of like a pet or a dog, where if you train them the wrong way, they’ll just start expecting to wait for a markdown.”
The other thing in that setting is that when they do that very successfully, the plane tends to be full. They tend to be able to allocate all the seats that they have. That’s sort of the price I think you pay for having that cheaper ticket. But the same message carries over into this setting. We find that when you do this sort of pricing correctly, with these simple sort of policies, you’re able to sell a lot more units. You’re able to put more products profitably in the hands of more people who want those products. There’s an allocative role there. I think an important message here is that, from a consumer welfare standpoint, this sort of pricing can have ripple effects that have positive implications.
[email protected]: What are some practical ways that retailers can apply this research?
Moon: I think one is to be able to understand why certain price policies might work, including ones that you’re using already. In the case of our retailer, we asked them, “Why are you using this type of policy?” They almost think of the customer sort of like a pet or a dog, where if you train them the wrong way, they’ll just start expecting to wait for a markdown. This was their way, heuristically, of not training the customer by introducing this uncertainty, making them unsure. But what we found was that you have different types of customers who have these different costs of monitoring this channel, and that’s really what’s driving what was good about this way of pricing.
“Even in this very informationally rich space, sometimes very simple policies and very simple decisions can be very effective.”
If you have a lot of data, be able to understand, even with a simple policy, why it is effective. The second message there was that simple works. In this setting where you were trying to, say, give coupons to your most price-sensitive customers and identify who they are, you have this mountain of data, recording all of their behavior online. What we find is that there are some very strong signals from that data. You only need a few things. If you look at how people monitor online, the frequency with which they monitor, that’s a very strong signal of their price elasticity. You don’t need to always be using all of that information. Tracking something very simple, like the ratio of purchases to visits online, is a very strong signal and captures almost all of that value that you would have from a sophisticated analysis of all the data.
[email protected]: What are you planning on looking at next?
Moon: The most related thing would be looking at these informational costs, these frictions, in a number of other settings. I’m doing some work in online marketplaces and other places where you can get very interesting data at the granular level. But more broadly, there are a lot of settings that are becoming much more informationally rich, whether it’s firms that are able to track you online, as a patient, in the marketplace or even in the workplace. An important aspect of these changes is to be able to understand how it affects firms who are experimenting to see what they can do with this sort of data, and how comfortable consumers and workers should feel about these changes. It’s a very interesting space from a research standpoint. I’m excited about it.
Article by [email protected]