Chris Martenson: Make Yourself More Self-Sufficient NOW, While It’s Still Easy…

Chris Martenson: Make Yourself More Self-Sufficient NOW, While It’s Still Easy…

Coming up we’ll hear a sensational interview with Dr. Chris Martenson of The Crash Course and Chris gives a stern warning to those who are becoming complacent and don’t seize on the opportunity to become more self-reliant and self-sufficient during this calm before the storm… and what appears to be an inevitable economic reset. Don’t miss my conversation with Chris Martenson, coming up after this week’s market update.

Listen to the Podcast Audio:

Macro Hedge Funds Earn Huge Profits In Volatile Macro Environment

Yarra Square Investing Greenhaven Road CapitalWith the S&P 500 falling a double-digit percentage in the first half, most equity hedge fund managers struggled to keep their heads above water. The performance of the equity hedge fund sector stands in stark contrast to macro hedge funds, which are enjoying one of the best runs of good performance since the financial crisis. Read More

Q&A with Chris Martenson

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome in Dr. Chris of, and author of the book Prosper! How to Prepare for the Future and Create a World Worth Inheriting. Chris is a commentator on a range of important topics such as global politicals, financial markets, governmental policy, precious metals and the importance of preparedness among other things. And it’s always great to have him with us.

Chris, welcome back and thanks so much for joining us again.

Chris Martenson: Thank you. It’s a real pleasure to be with you today, Mike, and all of your listeners.

Mike Gleason: Well, since this is actually the first time we’ve had you on in 2017, Chris, to get started here I’d like to have you set the stage for us because many of us continued to be confused and bewildered by the resilience of these markets. So, first off, give us your thoughts on the first 130 days or so of Trump’s presidency, and then how is it that the U.S. equities market continues to soar to new heights despite what appears to be massive overvaluation? Basically, assess for us what’s going on in the political and financial markets here during the first half of the year as we start off.

Chris Martenson: All right. Well, I love how you set that up, because they’re actually coincident in my mind. The first four months of 2017, we saw something that has never been seen in world history, and that was central banks across the globe creating a trillion dollars of new hot money. So, if you want to know anything I think about the markets, we have to start with 250 billion thin air hot money base currency units being created and tossed into the financial systems. That really is a large explanation factor. And of course, there was this idea that Trump was coming in and that this could put some sort of a fresh air, a theme here, but let’s be clear.

Trump was a surprise victory there, and at about 2:30 in the morning (on election night) with the Dow down 800 points, it rallied and got back to green by open, and no question in my mind, but that was official action, the Plunge Protection Team or somebody like that, and so I think that’s the world we’re in now, really. That’s my setup. The macro setup is the authorities are dumping huge amounts of money into markets to get them to go higher. They’re also making sure that markets can’t go down at any point. They do what they can. My view is they’ll do that until they can’t, and then it will break and it’d be very surprising for a lot of people.

Mike Gleason: Expanding the point here, Chris, lately we have been addressing the exhaustion that some bullion investors are feeling. They have spent the past decade watching as the growth in government data accelerated, something you’ve been following and documenting for years, all the way back to your amazing Crash Course presentation, which really opened my eyes when I first consumed that amazing material. The Fed and other central banks have abandoned all restraint, zero interest rates, monetizing treasury bonds, and mortgage securities, and other exotic programs. The federal government has been running massive deficits for even longer, for half a century at least, but none of this, to this point anyway, has seemed to matter.

The U.S. dollar appears to be holding up, the bond vigilantes have never shown up, stock prices are making all-time highs and no one on Wall Street seems to be interested in buying safe haven assets. Now, the upcoming webinar that you’re going to be doing here very soon, and we’ll get into those details later in the podcast, is titled, “The End of Money” and you will be making the case that these fundamentals do in fact matter. Talk for a minute about what you see developing and why you think safe haven investors just need to stay the course despite what appears to be a punishing environment.

Chris Martenson: Well, I’d love to. You have to have a macro view at a time like this. There’s no other way to explain, when you’re in the middle of the largest money printing experiment, and I use that word carefully, in all of human history. To try and think that what guided us in the past is going to be useful during the most extraordinary money printing of all time is, I think, misguided. What do we do with that? Well, I think we have to understand how much is being printed, what that actually means, what it really tells us about what the Fed is thinking, how scared they are. Listen, you’ve got your chips on one side of the table than the other.

Either they know exactly what they’re doing and they’ve got this all under control, or they really don’t. If you have all your chips on the “they’ve got this covered” side, I think it’s a bad debt at this stage. So that’s why we’re having this webinar, is to talk with people who have pretty good insights into who the Fed is, how they were founded, how they were organized, what they’re thinking currently, and really that means we’re in that speculative mode still. Because were trying to figure out, Mike, what’s the Fed going to do? It’s not very fundamental, but we do know that fundamentally, when we back up even further, there always has to be a balance between the money you create and the stuff you buy with it. In this story, the money we create is both currency and it’s debt.

They both operate like money, like if I take out a student loan for $50,000 and spend that money, that $50,000 that went out because of credit expansion. When we look at this story, the world has had the fastest period of credit expansion in the last eight years or so that it’s ever had. It has this extraordinary base money creation, largest in all of history by far. It’s driven up financial assets like stocks and bonds to ridiculous heights. Quite mysteriously, left commodities pretty much completely off of that particular run since 2011 and QE3. So, when we put all of that in one spot, all I see is that the claims no real wealth are increasing, and that’s both the debt and the currency.

With both of these increasing as fast as they are, I know there has to be a correction at some point, and things have gotten really extreme lately, all across the globe but particularly in equity markets, places like that. What can you do? This is a crazy bubble time, you have to sit back and watch, you have to understand where it comes from. In The Crash Course, I make the case, Mike, that we’re not dealing with the after effects of a housing bubble that burst in 2007. We’ve been growing our credit at twice the rate of our income in this story, so total credit market debt compared to GDP. The debt’s been growing twice as fast as our income in this story for 45 years. That’s what broke in 2008, and it hasn’t been able to be fixed because it’s just a dumb model.

“Hey, we’re going to grow our expenses and our expenditures at twice the rate of our income.” You know, you can’t do that as a person, so you can’t do it as a nation. That’s what we’ve been doing and that’s what I think has just gotten to extraordinary levels right here, with what the central banks are now trying to just keep this going a little longer. And we don’t have a lot of history to guide us here. We have seen currencies collapse in the past, we’ve seen economies really struggle. You see that in Venezuela, but there’s really nowhere to escape this one, truthfully, because the whole world is involved in this at this point. It’s not like you’re in Austria in 1918 and you could duck over the border and be in a safe country.

Where would you go, given that it’s really the dollar, the Yen, the Euro have all been principally on this train? China caught up really fast in this story. Where would you go? With that, I don’t have any great answers besides people need to understand the context and then begin to build resilience in their portfolio, financial resilience, but other forms of resilience around social capital, emotional capital, all of the other things that we talk about in Prosper!, because I personally don’t see a way to get out of this without experiencing a lot of pain, economically.

Mike Gleason: We certainly are in uncharted waters. Now, the Fed has had a bit lower profile since the November elections. Trump has decided to stick with Janet Yellen, at least for the time being, and the constant political drama in Washington seems to be dominating even when it comes to investing news. Frankly, the constant obsession over what the FOMC might do at their next meeting had become tedious beyond words, so we’ve been glad for the respite. However, there will be plenty of attention on this month’s meeting, where officials are expected to hike rates again.

Do you agree with the consensus that two to three more rate hikes are coming in 2017? If they keep hiking, it seems The Fed will eventually wind up at odds with Trump who would almost certainly like to avoid holding the bag during the next big economic slowdown. So, what are your thoughts about the Fed during Trump’s administration here, Chris, both in the short run and in the longer term?

Chris Martenson: Well, the Fed is really just running its own script at this point in time. It’s pretty independent of who’s in the White House, and Trump can try and lean on them a little bit, but he won’t lean on them in the way that you or I might think he should, which is to tighten things up would probably be a wise course of action. But something that I’ve written about and I’ve even produced a short video on recently, is that this dynamic you’re talking about of tightening is not actually happening in this cycle. Because in 2008, Congress gave the Federal Reserve the right to pay interest on excess reserves that are held by depository institutions at the Fed.

So, the Fed prints money and of course that creates lots of excess reserves in the banking system, then the banks put that back at the Fed, and the Fed pays interest on that. The last three hikes that we’ve seen, going from basically a range of between zero and a quarter percent, on up to the current 1% in quarter increments, what we saw is that each one of those moments on the same day that the Fed allegedly hiked interest rates, they also increased the amount they were going to pay on excess reserves. So, now the banks have a choice. Am I going to keep money risk-free at the Fed or am I going to lend it to bank B overnight? Of course, they increasingly just chose to take the safe, sure money from the Fed, and so this is what’s different about this particular story, is that now when the Fed raises rates, not only does it not remove money from the system, but it’s actually adding more money to the bank system because it pays interest.

Two trillion dollars held at the Federal Reserve right now will generate at current rates, 20 billion dollars of interest income to the big banks on a yearly basis. That’s adding money, that’s not subtracting. So, it’s totally different.

Mike Gleason: Now, you recently wrote a fascinating piece on your Peak Prosperity site about how the Fed, in your view, is destroying America. You’ve alluded to some of those reasons but talk about this, Chris. Why do you believe this to be the case?

Chris Martenson: Because what they’re doing, it’s not just printing money, but they’re social engineering. They have to pick winners and losers. I know it sounds like the Fed prints money and does these crazy sophisticated things, or buys treasury at an auction, or does a reverse repo, and all these fancy names, but really all they’re doing is they’re printing money and they’re handing it out to the market and taking pieces of debt in return for that. So, when you really look at that dynamic, the Fed has been the engineer of the largest wealth gap that we’ve ever seen in all of our history at this point in time. It’s engineered one of the most, if not soon to be the most punishing income gaps.

It’s also purposely driven up the prices of houses which if you think about it, isn’t actually good for anybody except the very few people who sell and downsize, and capture that gain. It’s not good for first time home buyers, it’s not good for existing home owners who have to pay higher property taxes and insurance bills and things like that. But the Fed drove this up and created huge income disparities and really drove up the actual true cost of inflation in all the areas, metropolitan areas particularly, where these new private equity firms like Blackstone came in and just scooped up lots of properties. So, when you look at all of this, what is The Fed really doing?

Well, they’ve locked out the millennial generation pretty handedly. They’ve enabled the federal government to go forward with even more aggressive indebtedness, in taking on more debt. They’ve really encouraged, if not almost forced corporations to engage in financial engineering, because hey, if you’re a CFO, you can borrow 1% and retire dividend yield in stock at 2%, do that all day long. Makes total sense, but companies have been doing financial engineering, not productivity engineering. So, all of these things you can lay at the feet of the Fed, and listen, if they wanted to run six months, maybe 12 months of emergency interest rate cuts, back in 2008, early in 2009, I would have said okay.

But how long are we into this now, right? Depending on how you count it, we’re at least eight years into this thing, maybe nine, and that’s a pretty long emergency don’t you think? And all that’s happening during this emergency is we’re watching those things I just described, just get wider and wider, and wider. More financialization, less investment. Harder starts for students and millennials and other young people coming in, not easier. Really low business formations, because a trillion dollars of interest income didn’t go to people who are the traditional savers, the moms, the pops, the dads, grandmas, who then take their interest income, that trillion missing dollars and use that to help their sons and daughters and granddaughters and grandsons start businesses.

So, we’re seeing all of these effects, and of course, just the big mystery is that really it’s not talked about all that much yet, but it should be.

Mike Gleason: In terms of the metals, Chris, it’s been a decent but unspectacular year, despite what appears to be the ongoing price manipulation schemes of these bullion banks. What are your thoughts on the gold and silver markets?

Chris Martenson: Well, I’m just going to deviate slightly into the Bitcoin market, and noticed today, I think it’s around $2,300 or so. It’s been gyrating a bit, and I know it was higher recently, but just watching how those prices are actually behaving, that to me looks something like a free and fair market, right? You can actually watch and make sense of the movements in those markets. As you and your listeners really well know, that once the leverage paper market gets wrapped around any market, it’s now open to the players who want to control those markets to do what they will.

So, in my mind, really important article for everybody to read, two weeks ago roughly in the Wall Street Journal, we had that article about how the quants, all these people who have the math skills who can come in and write the algorithms that now run Wall Street. Those algorithms have access to huge amounts of capital, most of them are really trading at millisecond, maybe microsecond speeds, and they’re running around doing things in various markets, including the precious metals markets. I think those have been under basically the direct control of the bullion banks for quite a while, and it’s been their own personal piggy bank, if you will. And hey, that all makes sense, right? But as you know and as I know, those gains can’t go on forever, and at this point, I think gold and silver have found what feels to me like a base here, hopefully.

I have a strong sense that when this next financial crisis or paralysis comes along, that people are going to want safe haven assets at that point, and the safer the better. That’s because I think there’s institutional risk, possibly even sovereign risk. Things could really get hammered. Once you understand how extraordinary