India’s mobile telecom market is undergoing a radical change. Last month, U.K. telecom giant Vodafone announced that it was merging its Indian subsidiary with local competitor Idea Cellular in a $23 billion deal to form the largest wireless telecom carrier in India — the world’s second-largest telecom market after China.
The new company will serve nearly 400 million customers and capture a 35% customer market share and 41% revenue market share. It also unseats leader Bharti Airtel, which had been busy with its own deals. Earlier this year, Bharti announced the acquisition of the Telenor’s India business. Telenor, a largely Norwegian government-owned entity, has been in India since 2009 but had made limited headway in the fiercely competitive market. It also paid $244 million for Tikona Networks, which has 20 MHz of 4G spectrum in five cellular mobile service areas.
“What is happening in the Indian telecom market is what you should expect given the cost and revenue structure of the industry: very high upfront fixed costs combined with very low marginal cost of voice and data transmission and a market that is very price sensitive,” says Ravi Aron, a professor at Johns Hopkins University’s Carey Business School. “We should expect to see rapid consolidation in such a market leaving only a few viable operators.”
Manoj T. Thomas, professor of strategic management at Indian business school XLRI, agrees. “This will lead to consolidation within the industry and enable merging firms to improve competitiveness,” he says. “Since inception, players in this industry have been trying to gain market share and also improve their margins by reducing costs and providing value-added services. Becoming a bigger player may help on both these dimensions.”
Triggering the spate of consolidation was the entry of a new mobile carrier, Reliance Jio Infocomm, which offered free services for months and sparked a brutal price war, according to Reuters. By merging, telecom companies can scale their services faster and combine staff and operations to reduce costs, giving them the wherewithal to offer lower prices on its services.
“Indian telcos have been engaged in a price war for quite some time to gain market share among India’s one billion mobile phone users,” says Soumya Sen, professor of information and decision sciences at the Carlson School of Management of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “Such competition usually benefits consumers by keeping prices low, but such mergers between competitors are also expected until equilibrium is reached.”
“What is happening in the Indian telecom market is what you should expect given the cost and revenue structure of the industry.” –Ravi Aron
The markets had a mixed reaction to the transaction. Shares of Idea Cellular fell from $1.50 on March 20 when the deal was announced to $1.31 on April 3 — a drop of 13%. Typically, the target company being acquired sees an increase in the share price. (Vodafone India is not public.) Idea Cellular hit a 52-week high of $1.95 in April 2016 and shares have largely been falling.
Details of the Deal
Vodafone and Aditya Birla (A.B.) Group, Idea Cellular’s parent governed by a shareholders’ agreement, will jointly control the new company. The U.K. telecom company will own 45.1% of the new company after transferring a stake of 4.9% to the A.B. Group for INR 39 billion ($579 billion) in cash upon the merger’s completion. Aditya Birla will then own 26% of the new company, with the right to acquire more shares and work towards equalizing their stakes over time, the companies said.
If Vodafone and the A.B. Group’s shareholdings in the new company are not equal after four years, Vodafone will sell shares to equalize its shareholding to that of the A.B. Group over the following five-year period. “The agreement starts with 45% and 26% and meets somewhere in between over a period of time,” says Vodafone CEO Vittorio Colao.
Vodafone India has an implied enterprise value of INR 828 billion ($12.4 billion) and INR 722 billion ($10.8 billion) for Idea, excluding its stake in Indus Towers, which Vodafone will retain. The valuation comes to 6.4x enterprise value/EBITDA for the last 12 months for Vodafone India and 6.3x for Idea. The newly combined company expects to save $10 billion after integration costs and spectrum liberalization payments and reduce costs by $2.1 billion annually four years after the merger closes, which is expected in 2018, pending regulatory and other approvals.
Chairman of the A.B. Group, Kumar Mangalam Birla, will be chairman of the new entity. The CEO and the COO will be appointed jointly, but Vodafone will have the sole right to appoint the chief financial officer. In 2016, Vodafone India had revenues of $6.7 billion against $5.5 billion for Idea. Vodafone India serves around 205 million subscribers and Idea more than 190 million, according to December 2016 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) figures. In contrast, Bharti serves about 265 million.
“Idea and Vodafone will together create a very valuable company given our complementary strengths,” explains A.B.’s Birla. Adds Vodafone’s Colao: “Vodafone is more typically a leader in the major metros and the urban market, whereas Idea has led the way in the rural and semi-urban areas.” He sees five carriers staying in the market over the long term, with the spectrum and capacity to be major players.
Telecom secretary J.S. Deepak told the Press Trust of India that the wireless telecom industry consolidation “is going to be very good for India.” The market will likely end up with four private and one government carrier … which is ideal.” A parliamentary committee has proposed a merger between two state-owned operators — Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) – according to The Economic Times.
A Five-player Scenario
The other telecom player doing deals is Reliance Communications (RCom), owned by Indian business magnate Anil Ambani, says Gagandeep Kaur, consulting editor at Telecom Talk, a New Delhi-based trade journal. In 2016, it announced the acquisition of Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. (SSLT) in an all-stock deal. SSLT, operating under the MTS brand, adds nearly 6 million subscribers to RCom, which has more than 86 million customers. RCom is merging with Aircel Ltd., which has 81 million customers. Meanwhile, the Tata Group has approached the RCom league to join forces, reports The Economic Times.
Can the Indian market support five big telecom carriers? For one, the state-owned operators will start out with a competitive disadvantage since they are hampered by higher labor costs. “The employee costs of both MTNL and BSNL are 10 times higher than their private counterparts,” Sen says.
“Since inception, players in this industry have been trying to gain market share and also improve their margins by reducing costs and providing value-added services.” –Manoj T. Thomas
However, it’s not so easy for the others to cut costs as well, despite the talk of merger savings. “The companies offer the usual rationale — efficiencies and synergies,” Aron says. “Let us examine this claim. In mergers between competitors that are in similar lines of business — think of airlines, banks, retailers, hotels — the efficiencies arise from productivity gains and attendant layoffs. In India, the Industrial Disputes Act makes it impossible to lay off workers. Exactly where will the efficiencies come from if there are minimal savings on labor?”
Aron adds that instead of asking whether the two state-owned operators should merge, the right question is whether they should exist at all “and what, if any, role should be played by BSNL? MTNL should sell its assets and exit. BSNL can act as an infrastructure provider for the underserved rural markets and extend the service infrastructure into areas that are difficult to penetrate — such as the mountainous northeastern states. As in the case of many public-owned enterprises in India, the BSNL raison d’être may be reduced to protecting the interests of its employees.”
The Vodafone-Idea merger has been talked about in the industry for months, but their hands were forced by Reliance Jio, owned by Mukesh Ambani, the richest man in India and brother of RCom’s Ambani. The carrier launched its service in late 2016 and provided free calls and data plus a host of other perks for a period of time. Within a month, it attracted 16 million subscribers. Jio crossed 100 million customers in February 2017 with such offers as its own $45 Lyf handset. It also offered the Jio Prime plan, which costs Rs.99 ($1.50) to join as a member. Afterwards, there is a monthly fee of Rs.303 (less than $5) for “unlimited” voice, data, SMS and apps.
“Jio is using the only means of differentiation that works in the retail (consumer) market — price discounting,” says Aron. “They are offering free voice at sign up with discounts on data that can be as much as 60% to 80% of mean rates in a region.” While these promotions may be hard to sustain, Thomas points out that “brand does provide some stickiness and despite number portability, customers may not shift back unless the other offers are significantly better.”
“In a sense, Reliance Jio’s being supported by a large corporate group with deep pockets may pose a bigger challenge as the battle for market share may continue for some time,” Thomas continues. “Their gain has been particularly in the broadband segment where value-added services are likely to be more prevalent. Jio has also disclosed its commitment by investments in infrastructure and technology and this makes their threat more realistic.”
When the freebies end, Sen says, there is potential for additional revenue opportunities for the merged entities after the market stabilizes in a year or so. To stay on top, Vodafone-Idea must appeal not only to price-sensitive customers but also urban folks who care about quality in terms of connectivity and speed.
However, “the real issue that needs more attention,” Sen notes, “is whether these price wars are slowing down investments in the network infrastructure by the operators or not. … Spectrum availability in the metro cities of India is almost one-tenth of those in the developed countries. Free public Wi-Fi availability is also rather poor compared to developed countries. So although the allure of free or cheaper plans may be useful in acquiring customers in the short term, it is unlikely that these customers will be satisfied with the lack of services, network congestion, and performance issues if the companies fail to invest in their networks.”
“The real issue that needs more attention is whether these price wars are slowing down investments in the network infrastructure by the operators or not.” –Soumya Sen
Telecom Towers M&A
The telecom wars go beyond a fight for subscribers; there is action brewing in the infrastructure space, too. Bharti has sold a 10.3% stake in its mobile tower arm Bharti Infratel to a consortium of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) for $947 million. Soon after, another 11.32% of the shares changed hands, but this was to Nettle Infrastructure, a group investment company.
Indus Towers, the world’s largest telecom tower company with over 120,000 towers, is also up for changes. Indus is owned by Bharti (42%), Idea Cellular (11.15%), Vodafone (42%) with the New York-based private equity firm Providence owning the rest. Vodafone’s 42% is not included in the merger deal while Idea’s 11.15% is in the mix.
According to The Economic Times, “With KKR and CPPIB on board, Bharti Infratel is eyeing Vodafone’s 42% stake in Indus Towers. … By becoming the majority (84%) owner in Indus Towers, the country’s largest tower company, Bharti Infratel will consolidate its position in the tower business and ward off possible competition from rivals like American Towers, who are also snooping for acquisition opportunities in the country.”
Meanwhile, RCom has received permission from the Competition Commission to sell its own tower division to Brookfield Infrastructure of Canada for $1.7 billion. It’s all an effort to reduce debt and to have deeper pockets ready for the market battles ahead.
Article by Knowledge@Wharton