FORECASTS & TRENDS E-LETTER
by Gary D. Halbert
March 28, 2017
- Trump Criticized Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen on the Campaign Trail
- How the Fed Board of Governors Controls Monetary Policy
- How Trump Could Appoint Five Members of the Fed Board
- Implications of Trump’s Upcoming Remake of the Fed Board
- Alpha Advantage Webinar This Thursday at 3:00 PM CST
The mainstream media is intently focused on the fate of President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch. Judge Gorsuch is imminently qualified to serve on the Supreme Court and, if confirmed, he would fill the seat of the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.
Yet the Democrats seem prepared to fight tooth and nail to block Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation at every turn, including a possible filibuster of his nomination. This seems odd given that Gorsuch would be replacing a conservative Justice, and the fact that he was unanimously approved by both Republicans and Democrats for his current position on the 10th Circuit of Appeals. So what don’t the Dems like now?
How Warren Buffett Uses Discount Rates To Value Stocks
Warren Buffett has never detailed the process he uses to value the businesses he acquires for Berkshire Hathaway. However, over the years, he has provided some limited insight into his methods. Q3 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Based on these comments, it is widely assumed that Buffett uses a discount cash flow model Read More
You would think the Democrats would save their opposition firepower for President Trump’s next Supreme Court nomination, which will almost certainly be to replace one of the aging liberal members of the High Court.
I could devote today’s E-Letter to a discussion of Judge Gorsuch’s Supreme Court nomination, but I suspect most of my readers are already following this topic to some extent. Instead, I’ll focus on an important topic which is getting almost no coverage in the mainstream media – at least not yet.
President Trump has the opportunity to reshape the Federal Reserve in his first term more than any president in recent memory. Mr. Trump will likely have the opportunity to appoint five of the seven members of the Fed Board of Governors in his first term in office.
Why is this important? Because the Federal Reserve Board of Governors ultimately controls the nation’s monetary policy and the level of interest rates. After almost a decade of unprecedented near-zero interest rates, Trump’s upcoming Fed appointments could change all that fairly quickly.
It’s a very important issue, but it’s complicated. I’ll try to break it down for you today. It’s difficult to decide where to start, but I’ll do my best.
Trump Criticized Fed Chair Janet Yellen on the Campaign Trail
I think the best place to start this discussion is to point out that Donald Trump frequently criticized Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen during his presidential campaign for keeping interest rates too low for too long.
While Trump stopped short of vowing to replace Yellen if elected president, most Fed-watchers believe that is exactly what he plans to do early next year. Ms. Yellen’s term as Fed Chair ends on February 3 of next year, at which time Trump can extend her term or replace her.
As I will discuss below, President Trump will also have the opportunity to replace several other members of the Fed Board of Governors during his first term in office. To understand why this is so important, let me briefly explain how the Fed Board of Governors works.
How the Fed Board of Governors Controls Monetary Policy
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, commonly known as the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), is the main governing body of the Federal Reserve System. The FRB is charged with overseeing the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks and with helping implement the monetary policy of the United States.
Fed Governors are appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate for staggered 14-year terms. Normally, there are seven members of the FRB, but currently there are only five members. President Obama could not get any of his FRB nominees confirmed by Congress.
Given this, President Trump has the opportunity to immediately nominate two individuals to fill the open seats on the FRB. Plus, one of the current five members of the FRB has announced that he will resign in April, leaving three seats for Mr. Trump to fill. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
The Federal Reserve Board is charged with several important functions, including:
- Decide the nation’s monetary policy to promote maximum employment, stable
prices and moderate long-term interest rates in the US economy;
- Promote the stability of the financial system and seek to minimize and contain systemic risks through active monitoring and engagement in the US and abroad;
- Regulate the safety and soundness of individual financial institutions and monitor
their impact on the financial system as a whole;
- Foster payment and settlement system safety and efficiency through services to the banking industry and the US government that facilitate US-dollar transactions and payments; and
- Promote consumer protection and community development through consumer-
focused supervision and examination, research and analysis of emerging consumer issues and trends and the administration of consumer laws and regulations.
The current members of the Federal Reserve Board (remember there are currently only five) are: Chair Janet Yellen, Vice-Chair Stanley Fischer, Jerome Powell, Ms. Lael Brainard and Daniel Tarullo.
The seven-members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors also serve as members of the Fed Open Market Committee (FOMC) which sets short-term interest rates. The FOMC normally includes the seven members of the FRB, four rotating Federal Reserve Bank presidents and the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York – for a total of 12 members.
How Trump Could Appoint Five Members of the FRB
This is a little complicated, but I think I can walk you through it. Remember that there are currently two vacancies on the normally seven-member Federal Reserve Board, so let’s start with them and then move on to the other members.
Two Vacancies: President Trump can immediately nominate two individuals to fill these two FRB slots. I don’t know why he hasn’t already.
Chair Janet Yellen: Her term as Fed Chair ends on February 3, 2018. It is widely expected that President Trump will replace her at that time. However, even though Yellen’s term as Fed Chair expires on February 3, she could stay on as a FRB Governor until January 2024 if she so chooses. This is where it gets complicated.
Remember, FRB Governors have 14-year terms. So Yellen could be replaced by Trump as Fed Chair but stay on as a Governor if she wants to. Most Fed-watchers do not believe Yellen will stay on at the Fed if Trump replaces her as Chair.
So to this point, we have three slots at the FRB for Trump to replace: the current two vacant seats and likely Janet Yellen.
Vice-Chair Stanley Fischer: His term as a FRB Governor does not expire until January 2020, so he could technically stay on as Vice-Chair, or as a Governor, even if Yellen is replaced. Yet Trump also has the authority to replace Fischer as Vice-Chair if he so chooses.
Most Fed–watchers believe that if Trump replaces Yellen, Fischer will resign as well. That, apparently, is the tradition. Plus, Mr. Fischer is 74 years old.
This brings us to four slots at the FRB for Trump to replace: the current two vacant seats, Janet Yellen and Stanley Fischer.
Governor Daniel Tarullo: He announced in February that he is resigning from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in early April, nearly five years before his term expires in January 2022. Governor Tarullo, who was appointed by President Obama in 2009, led the effort to oversee financial regulation (Dodd-Frank).
Tarullo’s resignation was seen as the result of President Trump’s call for the repeal of Dodd-Frank. So when he leaves the Fed next month, that will leave potentially five slots for Trump to replace.
Implications of Trump’s Upcoming Remake of the Federal Reserve
While the mainstream media is laser-focused on President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s ability to dramatically reshape the Fed just ahead should be getting a lot more attention. But it isn’t.
The question is, will President Trump use his potentially five (of seven) Fed Governor appointees to politicize the US central bank, or will he nominate mainstream candidates that will keep the Fed generally non-partisan?
Another question is, how will Trump want to reshape the Federal Reserve in light of his plans for wholesale deregulation of the financial industry (repealing Dodd-Frank)? So far, President Trump hasn’t announced any serious plans yet.
With Trump likely having the opportunity to appoint five of the seven Fed Governors in his first term, a clear majority of the Fed Board, his decisions could have major long-term implications for US monetary policy. We’ll have to wait and see.
With a Republican-controlled Congress, that seems ready to rubber-stamp Trump’s choices for important government positions rather than fulfill its “advise and consent” role, the implementation of monetary policy could change dramatically just ahead.
If Trump politicizes the Fed, for example, by stacking the Board with people who will attempt to implement whatever policies he desires, the Fed could be permanently damaged. But this could be a politically-challenging course for Trump to pursue.
I should mention that both President Bush (43) and President Obama were able to completely reconfigure the Fed Board of Governors during their time in the White House – but it is important to point out that they did it over eight years. Trump may have the ability to do it in just four years. This hasn’t happened in our adult lifetimes.
The fact that both Obama and Bush were able to stack the Fed Board did not raise huge concerns since both nominated competent people and both respected the Fed’s independence. That’s not to say that there were no concerns at all.
Yet despite the ideological differences over monetary and regulatory policy that led to these confirmation difficulties, Federal Reserve policy has been relatively consistent from administration to administration over the last several decades. This is due in no small part to politicians respecting the Fed’s independence.
If Trump wants to, he will be able to stack the Fed with people, qualified or not, who will implement the monetary and regulatory policies he desires. Hopefully, his pro-business Cabinet and senior Advisors will not let this happen.
Obviously, this is an important issue that remains to be seen as to how it will be resolved. President Trump, with his unprecedented number of appointees to the Fed Board of Governors in his first term, could go either way.
He could stack the Fed with Governors that will support his policies. Or he could continue the ways of Presidents Obama and Bush and appoint Fed Governors with generally independent views on policy.
I have no way of knowing, of course. But if I had to bet, I would lean toward President Trump favoring an independent Fed. While I do expect him to replace Janet Yellen as Fed Chair early next year, I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he will try to remake the Federal Reserve Board into a majority of “yes men.”
In closing, the Federal Reserve Bank is one of the most misunderstood institutions in American government. Conspiracy theories have abounded when it comes to the Fed for decades. Yet I have found that most of these conspiracy theories were unfounded.
The bottom line is that President Trump will have the ability to reshape the Federal Reserve in the next four years as no president has had in the Modern Era. It remains to be seen what he will do. I will keep you posted.
Alpha Advantage Webinar This Thursday at 3:00 PM Central Time
This is my final invitation for you to attend our Alpha Advantage Strategy webinar on Thursday of this week at 3:00 PM Central Time. The Alpha Advantage Strategy features three very successful professional money managers in a single account.
The Alpha Advantage Strategy’s performance results have been very impressive. You should take a look here at the performance. As always, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Our webinars with top performing money managers are really quite interesting. The manager makes a short (20-minute or so) presentation on how the program works, followed by an extended period of Q&A from listeners. You should really join us this Thursday.
Be sure to register for Thursday’s webinar. Even if you can’t attend, all those who register will be sent a link to the recording.
Wishing you profits,
Gary D. Halbert
- President Trump Could Remake the Fed in His Own Image, Or Not
- Fed Especially Uncertain of its Next Move, But Talks a Good Game Plan
- Why We Are So Unhappy When We Have so Much (Interesting read)
Article by Gary D. Halbert