Value Investing

John Neff – Why The Low P/E Strategy Works

If it’s one thing we love at The Acquirer’s Multiple it’s value investors and John Neff is a legend in the world of value investing.

Neff has referred to his investing style as a low price-to-earnings (P/E) methodology. He’s one of the best known mutual fund investors ever, notable for his contrarian and value investing style as well as heading Vanguard’s Windsor Fund.

Windsor was the best performing mutual fund during his tenure and became the largest fund closing to new investors in the 1980s. Neff retired from Vanguard in 1995. During Neff’s 31 years, from 1964 to 1995, Windsor returned 13.7% annually versus 10.6% for the S&P 500.

I recently read one of the best Neff interviews on the CFA Institute website.

Here’s an abstract from the Neff interview on the CFA Institute website:

Question: Can you offer some advice, some thoughts, or some enduring principles that have worked for you that are still relevant?

Neff: Well, certainly, the low-P/E strategy that I have been discussing continues to provide excellent odds. With Windsor, we were typically 50–60 percent of the market P/E. You do not have to be a magician to discover those stocks, but you do have to be pretty good at pursuing and analyzing them. And you have to stay on top of your analysis.

Usually, we would have a total return (growth rate plus yield) that was very competitive. About 200 bps of that performance was from a superior yield. In other words, the market would give us that yield, in effect, for nothing.  Stocks sell on their growth rate. So, our strategy incorporated a built-in advantage. I thought this advantage was gone three years ago, but it is coming back.

You can buy Citigroup with a 3 percent yield, which is 50 percent better than the DJIA and about 100 percent better than the S&P 500, with a 13–14 percent growth rate (my calculation). So, there are still stocks that provide a yield advantage. Keep in mind, however, that not all low-P/E stocks are attractive. Some of them are fundamentally poor companies in poor industries.

So, you have to pick the best of the bunch based on your analysis. And you do have to set some targets—your expected growth rate and how you think the market will eventually respond. If the investment is not measuring up to your expectations a year later, you have to readdress your analysis to make sure you do not have a fundamentally deteriorating situation.

Question: What is the difference between a value manager and a low-P/E manager?

Neff: Value is in the eye of the beholder. Low P/E is easily calculated and definitive.

Question: In low-P/E investing, how do you decide when you are right and what is your sell discipline?

Neff: We focus on total return, which, of course, is defined as growth plus dividend yield. In the olden days, we had a lot of 7 percent growers with a 7 percent yield. As a matter of fact, we had a big position (17 percent) in the regional Bells when they first were born in the mid-1980s. NYNEX Corporation, which was the Baby Bell in New York and New England, had a 9 percent yield.

So, we could determine total return. It was a 9 percent yielder, with a 7  percent growth rate selling for 60 percent of the market multiple. We were projecting that it would go to an 82 percent market multiple at some point in the future, so we set up an appreciation screen model accordingly. We determined that we were getting two times total return relative to the market multiple.

In other words, NYNEX was trading at 7–8 times earnings with a 9 percent yield and 7 percent growth, and thus 16 percent in total return (or more than twice its market multiple of 7 times). Admittedly, that is kind of hard to find these days.


To read the full Neff interview on the CFA Institute website click here, A Conversation with Legendary Value Investor John B. Neff, CFA.

Don’t forget to check out our FREE Large Cap 1000 – Deep Value Stock Screener, at The Acquirer’s Multiple: