Still casting about for a New Year’s resolution? If you’re an income-conscious investor, try this: expect that something unexpected will happen next year and act now to cushion your portfolio.
That advice may seem to be at odds with the current mood. Financial markets have decided that the incoming Donald Trump administration means faster economic growth and higher inflation—both good things for higher-yielding, higher-risk assets such as high-yield bonds.
We recognize the potential upside that a strong US economy and some of Trump’s policies present, and we think investors should certainly maintain exposure to high-yielding assets.
Below is our 13F roundup for some high profile hedge funds for the three months to the end of March 2021 (Q1). Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more The statements only include equity positions as 13Fs do not include cash and debt holdings. They also only include US equity holdings. Funds may hold Read More
But what if everything doesn’t go according to plan? What if Congress balks on some policy details? Or growth doesn’t pick up as quickly as expected? When markets tilt too strongly in one direction, finding your inner contrarian can be good for your portfolio’s health.
Dialing Down High-yield Risk
Contrarian does not mean pulling out of high yield altogether. A better idea might be to reduce risk by shortening maturities and focusing on quality. Our research has found that over time, high-quality, shorter-maturity bonds capture about 80% of upside moves in the high-yield market, but only about 70% of downside ones (Display).
Why does this combination work so well? First, shorter maturities mean investors are less exposed to rising interest rates and just about any type of unexpected market hiccup. So they tend to hold up better in down markets.
It’s a similar story with credit quality. Higher-rated securities from companies with strong balance sheets can weather a period of higher borrowing costs and investment outflows better than the issuers of CCC-rated “junk” bonds.
That’s easy to forget when markets are booming. The broad US high-yield market is up more than 16% this year, and CCCs have been top performers; the more CCCs investors bought, the better they did.
But this is not a viable long-term strategy, particularly at this late stage of the credit cycle. Even if the new policies do unleash faster growth, the inevitable rise in interest rates could push some CCC-rated issuers toward default.
Reaching Beyond Corporates
There’s income to be had beyond high-yield corporates, of course. That’s why a global, multi-sector approach is so important. The most effective high-income strategies seek diversification by drawing on multiple sources of income from around the world.
Among them are emerging-market local-currency bonds. While high-yield corporates extended the year’s rally after the US election results, these assets sold off sharply for fear of higher US interest rates and Trump’s protectionist trade policies.
That left valuations attractive in many cases—especially on assets from countries that have been cracking down on corruption and embracing tighter fiscal policies.
Another potential income generator—and diversifier: US securitized assets, particularly credit risk transfer securities (CRTs) from US government housing agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These allow investors to tap into a strong US housing market, and their floating rates make them appealing in a rising rate environment. Unlike typical agency debt, they have credit risk. But investors are compensated handsomely for it with high yields.
Recalibrating an investment strategy—even if only slightly—is always a good idea; we should all do it periodically throughout the year, not just in January. But with all the uncertainties facing investors now, it seems like a no-brainer this year.
By all means, we think investors should continue to lean toward high-yielding assets in 2017. But selectivity and diversification are critically important. This isn’t the time to limit yourself to a single sector or region.
The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.
Article by Gershon Distenfeld, Alliance Bernstein