Mid Cap Value Style 4Q16: Best And Worst

Updated on

The Mid Cap Value style ranks ninth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 4Q16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter, the Mid Cap Value style ranked ninth as well. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of nine ETFs and 104 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Value style as of November 7, 2016. See a recap of our 3Q16 Style Ratings here.

Figure 1 ranks from best to worst the eight Mid-Cap Value ETFs that meet our liquidity standards and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst rated Mid-Cap Value mutual funds. Not all Mid-Cap Value style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 22 to 2006). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.

Investors seeking exposure to the Mid-Cap Value style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5

* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Alpha ValueShares US Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is excluded from Figure 1 because its total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5

Mid Cap Value Style

* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Huber Capital Mid-Cap Value Fund (HUMEX) is excluded from Figure 2 because its total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

Direxion All Cap Insider Sentiment Shares (KNOW) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value ETF and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HNMVX) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. Both earn an Attractive rating.

PowerShares Russell Midcap Pure Value Portfolio (PXMV) is the worst rated Mid Cap Value ETF and Gabelli Focus Five Fund (GWSAX) is the worst rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. PXMV earns a Dangerous rating and GWSAX earns a Very Dangerous rating.

Best Buy Co (BBY: $39/share) is one of our favorite stocks held by KNOW and earns a Very Attractive rating. Best Buy is also on November’s Most Attractive Stocks list. Since 2004, Best Buy has grown after-tax profit (NOPAT) by 3% compounded annually. The company consistently earns a double-digit return on invested capital (ROIC) and currently earns a 13% ROIC. Most importantly, Best Buy has generated positive economic earnings each year since 2002. Despite the impressive fundamentals, BBY remains undervalued. At its current price of $39/share, Best Buy has a price-to-economic book value (PEBV) ratio of 0.7. This ratio means the market expects BBY’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 30%. If BBY can grow NOPAT by just 2% compounded annually for the next decade, the stock is worth $48/share today­­– a 23% upside.

NRG Energy (NRG: $11/share) is one of our least favorite stocks held by HWMAX and earns a Dangerous rating. Over the past decade, NRG’s economic earnings have declined from -$4 million in 2005 to -$1.6 billion in 2015. NRG’s economic earnings sit at -$1.4 billion over the last twelve months. The company’s ROIC has fallen from 9% in 2005 to a bottom-quintile 3% TTM. Despite the deterioration in business fundamentals, NRG is priced for significant profit growth. To justify its current stock price of $11/share, NRG must grow NOPAT by 8% compounded annually over the next 14 years. This expectation seems overly optimistic given the past decade of profit decline.

Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid-Cap Value ETFs and mutual funds.

Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds

Mid Cap Value Style

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds

Mid Cap Value Style

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Mid Cap Value Style

This article originally published here on November 7, 2016.

Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske and Kyle Martone receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.

Article by Kyle Martone, New Constructs

Leave a Comment