Young worms born to underfed moms handle starvation much better than those born to well-fed moms, new research shows.
“Mom somehow provisions the embryo, or programs it.”
The study involved two groups of tiny nematode worms called C. elegans. They live in soils and rotting vegetation, where they feed on microbes such as bacteria. Researchers fed one group of pregnant worms a normal diet of bacterial broth, and another group of expectant worms a watered-down version.
Stone House Capital Partners returned 4.1% for September, bringing its year-to-date return to 72% net. The S&P 500 is up 14.3% for the first nine months of the year. Q3 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Stone House follows a value-based, long-long term and concentrated investment approach focusing on companies rather than the market Read More
Then they reared the offspring of both groups without food for the first eight days of life, and monitored their growth and fertility over their lifespan. As expected, after eight days of starvation, the deprived larvae grew slower and were less fertile than worms that had a healthier start in life.
But surprisingly, starved worms whose mothers ate watered-down food during pregnancy weren’t as stunted as the offspring of well-fed mothers.
The differences lasted throughout their lifetimes. Baby worms born to underfed moms continued to make a better recovery long after the famine ended.
“They didn’t completely escape the adverse effects of early life starvation, but they were buffered from them,” says L. Ryan Baugh, a professor at Duke University.
The results are consistent with an idea from research on humans called the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. First proposed more than 20 years ago to explain the rise in type 2 diabetes in Western countries, the thinking is that pregnant women who don’t get enough to eat program their babies with “thrifty” metabolisms that are good at rationing nutrients and storing fat.
Thrifty metabolisms can spell trouble later in life if mothers raised in scarcity have children raised in abundance, as is thought to be the case for many modern humans. But the Duke study shows that reprogramming an unborn baby’s metabolic thermostat can be a good thing for babies that grow up in the same scarce conditions their mothers did.
In Baugh’s study, the effects of prenatal nutrition were only apparent for worms born in lean times. Baby worms reared in plentiful conditions did well whether their moms got enough to eat during pregnancy or not.
“These animals are able to anticipate adverse conditions based on their mothers’ experience,” Baugh says. “But if the environment actually changes for the better, the worms are able to sense and respond to good conditions and make the best of it.”
The molecular mechanisms behind the buffering effects of maternal diet are still unclear.
Dwindling food supplies during pregnancy seem to trigger worm mothers to make bigger, better-provisioned eggs for the lean times that may lie ahead, the study shows.
One possibility is that hunger during pregnancy slows the rate of ovulation, so that the developing egg has more time to grow before it gets fertilized.
It’s also possible that maternal diet causes changes in gene expression that are passed down to her offspring.
Baugh’s team is now focusing on a network of genes known from other C. elegans studies to regulate the movement of fats between eggs and other cells in the worm’s body.
“Mom somehow provisions the embryo, or programs it,” Baugh says.
The National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health funded the study, which appears in PLOS Genetics.
Source: Duke University
Original Study DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006396
Article by Robin Smith-Duke