RNC: PolitiFact Has A History Of Anti-Right Bias by Connor D. Wolf
Heading into the first presidential debate as so-called fact-checkers prepare to parse the candidates’ words, some are worried about the potential partisanship of these media sources. One of the most-cited fact-checkers, PolitiFact, has a history of showing anti-right bias in its supposedly nonpartisan fact-checking, according to the Republican National Committee.
Republicans believe the fact-checker has shown a clear left-leaning bias. There are a number of cases where it would appear they scrutinized claims from the right much more than from the left. RNC Research Director Raj Shah notes the imbalance seems to always work against Republicans.
At this year's SALT New York conference, Jean Hynes, the CEO of Wellington Management, took to the stage to discuss the role of active management in today's investment environment. Hynes succeeded Brendan Swords as the CEO of Wellington at the end of June after nearly 30 years at the firm. Wellington is one of the Read More
“Things that are not literally true are rated ‘correct’ because there was a kernel of truth. That’s not fact-checking, that’s opining,” Shah told InsideSources. “It seems as though whenever you find these inconsistencies they work against Republican favor.”
The Center for Media and Public Affairs, for instance, concluded in a 2013 study that PolitiFact rated Republican claims as false three times as often as those of Democrats. PolitiFact rated 32 percent of Republican claims as false compared to 11 percent of Democratic claims, according to the study.
“We’re not just validating numbers,” PolitiFact Executive Director Aaron Sharockman told InsideSources. “We’re trying to provide context and look at the broader picture of how people will interpret that.”
PolitiFact has cited a number of Republican claims to be inaccurate simply because they lack context. Sharockman notes the rating system isn’t purely based on the literal data but also the message itself. PolitiFact will take into account whether a person is making a misleading statement even if the data is correct.
PolitiFact recently found itself at odds with the RNC over youth unemployment in the black community. The RNC claimed Sept. 17 that unemployment among black youth is up under President Barack Obama. Democratic Sen. Sanders used the same study to claim two months prior that young blacks are struggling more than whites. PolitiFact rated the Republican claim mostly false while validating Sanders.
“Standard statistics show that black youth unemployment has declined by one-third or more since 2009 when Obama took office,” PolitiFact wrote when critiquing the RNC. “The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False.”
Both the RNC and Sanders based their claims on a study from the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute (EPI). Republicans cited unemployment while Sanders discussed both unemployment and underemployment. PolitiFact claims Republicans cherry-picked and misinterpreted old research.
“The claim that we’re making is that joblessness under this president for young African-Americans has not gotten better, it has gotten worse,” Shah said. “Bernie Sanders’ point, that the rate of joblessness among young African-Americans was only verified two months ago and he cited the same thing. He’s making the same point.”
Sharockman notes the two statements were based on data that was distinctly different from each other. He adds Republicans were talking about unemployment while Sanders was discussing underemployment. In actuality, Sanders cited both unemployment and underemployment.
“All you have to do is look into the piece written about the RNC where it was mostly false,” Sharockman noted. “They said unemployment, the EPI study said underemployment. Any labor reporter would know that underemployment is not unemployment.”
The unemployment rate tracks the people not working while underemployment tracks those working below their skill set including those not working. EPI Media Relations Director Dan Crawford notes the two sets of data are distinctly different and that Republicans didn’t make that clear.
“Our figure wasn’t looking at overall black youth unemployment,” Crawford told InsideSources. “They’re misinterpreting it, or at least they could have been more specific.”
The EPI study found underemployment for young black college graduates went from 14.7 percent in December 2008 to 23.0 percent in March 2015. It remained below 20 percent in the years leading up to 2009. The study makes few references to unemployment.
“We take the actual words very seriously,” Sharockman noted. “In this case the RNC said unemployment, that is not what the statistic they sent us shows.”
Additionally, Republican Rep. Mike Pence was rated mostly false July 14 for saying more people in Indiana are working than ever before. Sharockman notes the claim might be true but that it was misleading. Pence made it appear as though his party was the reason employment is higher while ignoring population growth.
“We are not just calculators, we don’t just deal in absolute truth,” Sharockman stated. “We measured it as a share of employed as a percentage of the population and found it wasn’t the highest. So in raw numbers of course it is, but the fact is in five years it will be a new record because Indiana will grow in population.”
The RNC also took issue with the fact-checker August 30 in a blog entry posted on its website. Republicans claimed then-Sen. Hillary Clinton voted to raise taxes on individuals making $41,500 back in 2008. PolitiFact Florida rated the claim mostly false because the vote was on a nonbinding budget resolution.
“Budget resolutions lay out clear policy priorities and set spending and tax assumptions about revenue for congressional appropriators,” the RNC blog entry detailed. “We’ve seen votes on them in attack ads for years.”
The RNC blog entry argued that same scrutiny wasn’t applied when PolitiFact North Carolina validated attack ads citing Republican nonbinding votes. The RNC blog entry adds the different standard shows bias, incompetence and possibly even both.
About the Author
Connor Wolf discovered his love for writing and politics at a young age while growing up in Connecticut. He eventually had the chance to pursue his passions when entering the world of journalism. Since that time he has covered labor policy, business and financial regulations.