Biggest ocean animals are ‘poised to disappear’
An unprecedented pattern of extinction in the oceans today that largely targets large-bodied animals over smaller creatures is likely driven by human fishing, a new study suggests.
“We’ve found that extinction threat in the modern oceans is very strongly associated with larger body size,” says Jonathan Payne, a paleobiologist at Stanford University. “This is most likely due to people targeting larger species for consumption first.”
Should you invest in cryptocurrencies? As with all investments, it depends on many factors. At the Morningstar Investment Conference on Thursday, Matthew Hougan of Bitwise, Tyrone Ross, Jr. of Onramp Invest and Annemarie Tierney of Liquid Advisors joined Morningstar's Ben Johnson to talk about portfolio allocations to cryptocurrencies. Q2 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and Read More
“The bigger you are, the more likely you are to be facing extinction.”
Payne and colleagues examined the association between extinction threat level and ecological traits such as body size for two major groups of marine animals—mollusks and vertebrates—over the past 500 years and compared it with the ancient past, stretching as far back as 445 million years ago and with a particular emphasis on the most recent 66 million years. Their findings will appear in the journal Science.
“We used the fossil record to show, in a concrete, convincing way, that what is happening in the modern oceans is really different from what has happened in the past,” says coauthor Noel Heim, a postdoctoral researcher in Payne’s lab.
Specifically, they found that the modern era is unique in the extent to which creatures with larger body sizes are being preferentially targeted for extinction. “What our analysis shows is that for every factor of 10 increase in body mass, the odds of being threatened by extinction go up by a factor of 13 or so,” Payne says. “The bigger you are, the more likely you are to be facing extinction.”
The selective extinction of large-bodied animals could have serious consequences for the health of marine ecosystems, because they tend to be at the tops of food webs and their movements through the water column and the seafloor help cycle nutrients through the oceans.
The findings should be incorporated into decisions about how we manage ocean resources like fisheries, says Judy Skog, program director in the National Science Foundation’s Division of Earth Sciences, which funded the research.
“These results show that larger marine animals are poised to disappear from the seas faster than smaller ones. Studies of the fossil record indicate that this trend didn’t exist in the past—it’s a new development in today’s world.”
ocean animals – Largest animals get killed first
While the researchers didn’t directly examine why large modern marine animals are at higher risk of extinction, their findings are consistent with a growing body of scientific literature that point to humans as the main culprits.
“It is consistent with the tendency for fisheries to first exploit larger species and subsequently move down the food web and target smaller species,” says coauthor Matthew Knope, a former postdoc in Payne’s lab who is now an assistant professor of biology at the University of Hawaii at Hilo.
It’s a pattern that scientists have seen before. On land, for example, there is evidence that ancient humans were responsible for the massacre of mammoths and other megafauna across the globe.
“We see this over and over again,” Heim says. “Humans enter into a new ecosystem, and the largest animals are killed off first. Marine systems have been spared up to now, because until relatively recently, humans were restricted to coastal areas and didn’t have the technology to fish in the deep ocean on an industrial scale.”
If there is one silver lining in the troubling new findings, it’s that there is still time for humans to change their behavior, Payne says.
“We can’t do much to quickly reverse the trends of ocean warming or ocean acidification, which are both real threats that must be addressed. But we can change treaties related to how we hunt and fish. Fish populations also have the potential to recover much more quickly than climate or ocean chemistry.
We can turn this situation around relatively quickly with appropriate management decisions at the national and international level.”
Researchers from the University of Connecticut and the University of California, Santa Barbara, are coauthors of the study.
Source: Stanford University
Photo by Unsplash (Pixabay)