Here Is The Proof That Foreigners Are Not Stealing American Jobs
There are many popular myths about economics, but one in particular is presently in vogue. Some people blame foreigners for domestic unemployment. Some foreigners get blamed for taking jobs away from Americans, as employers outsource. Some foreigners get blamed for domestic unemployment because they “took our jobs” after arriving here in the United States.
Politicians who blame foreigners for the poor state of labor markets in the United States are profoundly misinformed.The idea that foreigners take jobs away from Americans is generally untrue. There is strong evidence specifically that the inflow of foreigners does not elevate domestic unemployment. Some politicians focus exclusively on the unemployment rate when arguing that Americans lose jobs to those who migrate to our domestic labor market.
In August, Mohnish Pabrai took part in Brown University's Value Investing Speaker Series, answering a series of questions from students. Q3 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more One of the topics he covered was the issue of finding cheap equities, a process the value investor has plenty of experience with. Cheap Stocks In the Read More
Correct analysis of the causes of unemployment requires additional data. The idea that migrants take a limited number of jobs away from Americans assumes that there are a limited number of jobs. Examination of job vacancy rates reveals that there have been a relatively large number of unfilled jobs in recent years.
Economists use the “Beveridge Curve” (named after Sir William Beveridge) to examine the relative availability of jobs. The Beveridge curve is simply a plot of job vacancy rates against unemployment rates. The official unemployment rate, or U-3 rate, counts active job-seekers as unemployed but omits people who have given up looking for work.
As one might expect, there tends to be high numbers of unfilled jobs during periods of low unemployment, and vice-versa. The logic behind the Beveridge Curve is simple: vacant jobs get filled more readily when there are many job-seekers, not when there are relatively few. Consequently, increases in job vacancies go with reductions in unemployment.
American jobs – The Beveridge Curve
Changes in actual unemployment and job vacancy rates during the subprime boom and crash are shown in red on the next graph. Unemployment rates fell during the subprime boom, during which time job vacancies became more common. With low unemployment, it became harder to fill open positions. Unemployment rose considerably during the 2008 subprime crash, after which the job vacancy rate was cut in half.
The recovery of employment since 2009 has been slow. One aspect of the sluggish recovery is that there have been a relatively large number of vacant jobs. The Beveridge curve has shifted. The old Beveridge curve ran until about the end of 2009. Starting in 2010 job vacancies edged up. The official unemployment rate gradually fell over the past few years, but job vacancies have risen somewhat faster. The most recent data point for unemployment and job vacancy rates (June 2016) is in line with the new trajectory for the Beveridge curve.
The exact causes of the post-subprime shift of the Beveridge curve are an important, but separate, issue. The primary issue here is with the allegation that foreigners take jobs from Americans. The implication of the shift in the Beveridge curve is obvious: the alleged competition between newcomers and natives over a few vacant jobs does not really exist. Job vacancies have been running at high levels, relative to unemployment, for over six years. Hiring has been slow in the past six years, but job creation has been better.
Inspection of the pre- and post-subprime Beveridge curves shows that job creation has outpaced unemployment reductions. The initial 2010 shift in the Beveridge curve raised the relative job vacancy rate just over half a percentage point. At the most recent (August) 4.9% unemployment rate, the corresponding job vacancy rate is one percentage above the last time unemployment fell to 4.9% (in 2005)- with a vacancy rate slightly over four percent now, instead of just over three percent then.
The relative rise of job vacancies is not due to the unemployment rate hitting rock bottom. The official U-3 unemployment rate has been lower than the rates seen for the summer of 2016, and there are large numbers of working age people who have exited the labor force anyway. While the number of Americans without work is relatively high, higher than suggested by the U-3 statistic, this fact is not due to migrants taking scarce jobs. The job vacancy rate shows that there are are many unfilled jobs, which could be filled by discouraged American workers and migrant workers both, even if we assume a fixed number of current vacant jobs.
American jobs – The Why of Job Loss
The number of jobs is not fixed. Entrepreneurs hire as many workers as they find profitable. Profitability is simply a matter of people being willing to work, earn, and spend money on goods. There are significant problems in the current US economy. Employers do have ideas about hiring more employees, about producing more goods for profit. Many plans for potential hiring are not being undertaken. Lack of faster hiring in the midst of job vacancies is a sure sign that policies designed to counteract the subprime debacle have failed. Past failures are, of course, sunk costs, though we can learn from the past.
Politicians who blame foreigners for the poor state of labor markets in the United States are simply misinformed. Lack of hiring has left some people behind, but that is because open jobs are not being filled, not because migrants are taking a fixed number of available domestic jobs. Employers keep creating more jobs, depending upon the productivity and availability of labor.
American jobs – Look at Policy
Actual hiring has been slow relative to potential hiring in recent years due to other reasons. What are some possible causes of the hiring slowdown in recent years? Perhaps growing regulatory burdens and wasteful government spending and borrowing have caused employers to delay hiring plans. Perhaps the sheer complexity or uncertainty regarding regulations has caused hesitancy among employers. Perhaps government unemployment and disability benefits have left some people less anxious about finding work.
The current labor market conditions have led some Americans to give up looking for work. The solution to the hiring problem can only be found by identifying the actual causes of slow domestic hiring, not by falsely blaming migrants for a domestic situation of our own making.
D. W. MacKenzie is an assistant professor of economics at Carroll College in Helena, Montana.
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.