Asset Protection’s Significant Setback Is Great News For Creditors by Chuck Tatelbaum, Tripp Scott
A recent decision and opinion by Bankruptcy Judge Robert A. Mark of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida has created a potential nightmare and morass for those who seek to use asset protection vehicles as part of an overall estate plan or independently, and, at the same time, has created a new opportunity for creditors seeking to recover unpaid debts.
Traditionally, bankruptcy trustees have the power and authority to avoid fraudulent transfers, subject to applicable statutes of limitation. Thus, if transfers are made significantly prior to a bankruptcy filing so that the statute of limitations has expired, the trustee or creditors in the bankruptcy case cannot attempt to claw back the assets transferred.
Apollo Global is no longer the “king of distress”: Josh Harris
The Bankruptcy Code provides for a two-year statute of limitations for trustees in the pursuit of fraudulent transfers. However, the Bankruptcy Code also allows trustees to utilize state statutes for fraudulent transfer that may be more liberal. Since most states have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act which contains a four-year statute of limitations, in most instances trustees have been limited to the pursuit of transfers that occurred within four years.
Judge Mark’s ruling holds that since the Internal Revenue Code contains a 10 year statute of limitations for the avoidance of fraudulent transfers, if the IRS is a creditor in a particular debtor’s case, which happens a significant amount of time, the bankruptcy trustee can utilize the IRS’ 10 year statute of limitations and pursue fraudulent transfers within 10 years of their occurrence.
This is particularly significant because individuals connected with businesses, individual guarantors, individuals that have a high net worth and others utilize asset protection vehicles as part of overall estate plans (legitimately or otherwise). Once the statute of limitations has expired, these individuals and any businesses and their financial professionals and attorneys breathe aside a sigh of relief in thinking that the transfers are immune from pursuit by bankruptcy trustees.
Since Judge Mark’s decision is based upon settled legal principles which have been logically extended, there is every reason to believe that this decision will be adopted by bankruptcy judges and appellate courts throughout the country.
The significance of this ruling is further accentuated by the fact that bankruptcy trustees may now review transfers that occurred more than four years prior to the bankruptcy filing but less than 10 years before the filing and turn upside down the complacency of the individuals, businesses, financial professionals and attorneys that had relied on the expiration of the four-year statute of limitations.
About Chuck Tatelbaum
Charles M. Tatelbaum is chair of the creditors’ rights and bankruptcy practice and partner at the Tripp Scott law firm in Florida. He focuses his practice on bankruptcy and creditors’ rights issues, complex business litigation, Uniform Commercial Code transactions and lender liability litigation and other types of secured transactions, as well as domestic and international letters of credit.
He regularly represents secured and unsecured creditors in transactions and insolvency situations, creditors’ committees, and throughout the United States he represents business clients in complex business litigation, the defense of lender liability claims, all types of bankruptcy proceedings and products liability defense based on warranty. He also represents secured and unsecured creditors in distressed business transactions and litigation. He has also has represented clients in Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy proceedings and Chapter 15 foreign bankruptcy proceedings.
As an example, he represented the major motor vehicle floor plan lender in the largest motor vehicle dealer bankruptcy in U.S. history, recovering more than $150 million, which constituted payment in full of principal, interest, attorney fees and costs. In that case, the court awarded a $300,000 substantial contribution fee to the represented lender. As another example, he has represented the lender in the worldwide bankruptcy proceeding of Saab Automobiles, and was able to obtain payment in full of all principal, interest and attorneys’ fees. As of a result of his prior work with the U.S. State Department in eastern Europe to develop bankruptcy laws in Croatia and Slovakia, Mr. Tatelbaum has regularly handled business and insolvency issues that develop in foreign countries