Richard X. Bove, Vice President Equity Research at Rafferty Capital Markets, discusses how the employment numbers can be misleading.
Theater Of The Absurd – The Employment Numbers
Do They Make Any Sense?
The purpose of this commentary is not to suggest the economy is increasing in strength or weakening. It is to demonstrate that the labor numbers in any given period can be misleading.
Themes for the next decade: Cannabis, 5G, and EVs
A lot changes in 10 years, and many changes are expected by the time 2030 rolls around. Some key themes have already emerged, and we expect them to continue to impact investing decisions. At the recent Morningstar conference, several panelists joined a discussion about several major themes for the next decade, including cannabis, 5G and Read More
Collecting the Data
Each month the Labor Department collects a sample of employment information from two sources:
- A number of companies are contacted and asked to indicate the net change in employment at their facilities. This is called the Establishment Series and it is used as the basic indicator of employment trends.
- The second series, or the Household Series is obtained by calling a number of households and asking if the members of the household have jobs or not. The results of this series are used to establish the unemployment trends.
Both sets of numbers are then seasonally adjusted to provide smoothed data trends. Thus, every month the Labor Department provides 4 numbers to indicate the level of employment in the United States economy. In the long run most of these numbers tend to correlate virtually perfectly. In the short run, they can give conflicting signals.
The table above indicates that the statisticians are able to fix the data after the fact so that the correlation works perfectly between the employment numbers in the Establishment and Household data in the long run (1948 to the present). In the short-run (last 12 months) this is not the case for the non-seasonally adjusted (NSA) numbers.
Thus, for example in April 2016, the SA Establishment numbers showed a 123,000 gain in employment while the SA Household numbers showed a 316,000 decline in employment. This gets fixed months after the fact.
SA vs. NSA
Once again in the long-run it is easy to bring the seasonally adjusted numbers in line with the non-seasonally adjusted numbers. However, in the short-run these numbers can get very much out-of-line with each other. For example, in May, the NSA numbers indicated a 651,000 increase in employment in the Establishment data. The SA data for the same month showed a 38,000 increase. The gap between the two numbers is 17:1. This is very likely to be adjusted so that the two numbers get closer together.
Employment vs the Unemployment Rate
There is no correlation between the number of people who get jobs every month and the unemployment rate. Presumably, this is because one number is from the SA Establishment Series and the other is from the SA Household Series.
The over-emphasis on the monthly Labor Department numbers concerning employment is a huge mistake because these numbers can be very misleading.