Insider dealing – a crime not a perk

0
Insider dealing – a crime not a perk


Tim Bennett Explains: Insider dealing – a crime not a perk

Gator Financial Partners 1H2022 Performance Update

Screenshot 30Gator Financial Partners letter to investors for the first half of the year ended June 30, 2022. Q2 2022 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Dear Gator Financial Partners:  We are pleased to provide you with Gator Financial Partners, LLC’s (the “Fund” or “GFP”) 1st Half 2022 investor letter. This letter reviews the Fund’s 1st Read More

0:57
know somebody does so the accountant phoned his friend broke up and the trade
1:03
is done the shares are bought a week later the results were announced they
1:07
rise 25% is there a problem or how many problems that we call you returning to
1:13
that scenario shortly so what is insider dealing right first of all it is a
1:21
criminal offence so the test in a court of law is described as beyond reasonable
1:27
doubt that’s roughly speaking 90% or more certainty it’s not a civil defense
1:32
missile defense ease the burden of proof is lower easier than at people for if
1:37
you like because it’s described as being convinced on the balance of
1:40
probabilities so a jury needs to get beyond reasonable doubt about what three
1:46
things number one an insider is involved but the confusing thing about insider
1:53
dealing is a title is the wit of the number of people in acts that are
1:58
covered by the legislation to an insider is quite a broad definition in a moment
2:04
number to all of the past price-sensitive information is involved
2:09
a number three
2:11
it’s used in a deal used to facilitate a deal buy or sell shares for example or
2:17
it simply passed own son
2:21
although it’s called insider dealing just bypassing all illegal
2:25
price-sensitive information you can be called so who are insiders taking those
2:33
21 in the first of all directors or partners or if you like primary insiders
2:40
they obviously people who have regular access to price-sensitive information
2:45
because they’re running businesses and these are businesses if you think about
2:48
it that are subject to information
2:51
announcement rules and regulations so they’re right in the firing line
2:56
potentially employees because they have close contact with directors artists
3:01
shareholder anyone connected with insider so you get within the law
3:08
what a typed list and then suddenly anybody knows who can be connected to an
3:14
insider a wife a friend a broker doesn’t matter inside information then test who
3:22
is what not publicly available and there are definitions of this example listed
3:27
companies have an obligation to release information to the market at certain
3:31
times about their results are expected to adhere to that change your number to
3:37
price sensitive information which is expected
3:41
reasonably to move a sharp rise up or down people sometimes think insider
3:47
trading is all about getting in early to make a profit can also be about getting
3:51
out early to avoid a lots of thing about one number three there is no intention
3:57
to make a profit or avoid a lot so the guilty mind as lawyers call it comes
4:04
into this you think I’m gonna use that information to make money or avoid
4:09
taking a hit now that’s not a problem how many insiders we got how we got
4:15
insider trading going on and I would argue these people aren’t careful you’ve
4:20
got for insider traders on the screen at least alright because a company director
4:26
is a primary insider and this is likely to be
4:32
price-sensitive information and what he’s done is passed it all they might
4:39
say is passed it on to his wife could be very very careful about doing exactly
4:43
that kind of thing if there is a possibility
4:46
lee’s wife will go and deal you can I’m agent or worse yet she instructs his
4:50
wife to go India thinking it’s not me doing the deal that’s all right now it
4:54
isn’t she is connected to an insider close their accounts and it was also
5:00
connected to an insider and asked him to buy some shares on their behalf well as
5:04
it there’s basically passing on the information hoping someone will use it
5:10
to your benefit he found his friend broke up again and the deal is done now
5:18
whether the broker for example he’s an insider some debate you need to know
5:25
more but I would say potentially you have for insiders heroes lot of people
5:30
with sight 11 isn’t just this guy’s the problem is not what he’s the star the
5:35
problem but the trail goes out quite a lot wider and that’s the point about
5:40
insider dealing you don’t have to be an insider and you don’t have to deal to be
5:44
prosecuted
5:45
ironically enough now if you’re accused of this unique defenses you human
5:51
obviously did you like there are some defense is the trade would have occurred
5:54
at a time anyway I without inside information so sometimes directors trade
6:00
because they need to raise money they’ll sell shares to pay a tax bill school
6:04
fees for argument sake if they can prove that by reason to assume the inflation
6:09
is already in the public domain information which is in the public
6:12
domain account for example on a train you look out the window you see a
6:17
factory on fire
6:19
crikey I know the business that runs out that you found your broker they don’t
6:23
all my stock in that company eww stock share price subsequently plunges is that
6:29
insider dealing no because anybody in theory could have seen the factory was
6:33
on fire
6:33
worked it all out you just happen to be first different did not expect the
6:38
information to be price-sensitive
6:40
prove it did not expect to deal now clearly directors policy information on
6:46
to other directors partners talk to other partners employees talk to each
6:49
other
6:50
provided at doing it in the course of their employment you can say is an
6:54
insider trading otherwise company directors couldn’t share information
6:57
with anybody would clearly be silly but does a company director need to share
7:00
information with his wife even if it’s natural to want to do so after a hard
7:04
day in the office no court argument to be careful equally an apartment in your
7:10
friends no penalties are quite severe up to seven years in prison brews across
7:17
things beyond reasonable doubt as I hurdle seven years in prison or an
7:21
unlimited fine people are surprised by that you know those penalties can be
7:30
applied almost anyone in my original change by the way they have it
7:34
little bit of a warning insider dealing criminal offence definitely not any

Updated on

No posts to display