Another Strong Quarter For Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, Another Profitable Pay-Out To Treasury

Another Strong Quarter For Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, Another Profitable Pay-Out To Treasury

Fannie Mae

Photo by NCinDC

Another Strong Quarter For Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, Another Profitable Pay-Out To Treasury by Investors Unite

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both boasted healthy second quarters this year, according to earnings reports released this week. Fannie Mae boasted $4.6 billion in net income while Freddie Mac showed an impressive $4.2 billion for the same.

Play Quizzes 4

The Wall Street Journal noted that “an interest-rate increase helped drive a 27% rise in [Fannie Mae’s] second-quarter profits” while Politico Pro reported earlier this week that Freddie reversed losses from derivatives holdings into gains” with the second quarter of this year showing a vast improvement from the same period last year when Freddie had just $1.36 billion in profit. Or, as HousingWire notes, an “astounding 702% increase in just one quarter.”

No doubt, U.S. Treasury officials cheered over the combined $8.3 billion the companies will turn over to the agency in September as part of the ongoing Third Amendment Sweep. That payment will bring the total amount Treasury has siphoned from the enterprises to a whopping $239 billion, which more than repays the $187.5 billion they received in bailout funds a few years ago. After the September payment, Fannie Mae will have paid Treasury $142.5 billion (she received $116.1 billion) and Freddie will have paid $96.5 billion (he took $71 billion in bailout funds).

Exodus Point Outperforms As Rates Trading Profits Jump [Exclusive]

Value Bin Default RatesMichael Gelband’s Exodus Point launched in 2018 with $8.5 billion in assets. Expectations were high that the former Millennium Management executive would be able to take the skills he had learned at Izzy Englander’s hedge fund and replicate its performance, after a decade of running its fixed income business. The fund looks to be proving Read More

As we awaited the companies’ earnings reports, we thought back to what Fannie Mae’s chief economist said at the release of the first quarter earnings this year:

“The first half of this year performed a lot better than what was originally expected, giving extra momentum to the start of the second half of the year.

“‘Our second-half outlook is little changed overall, but we have upgraded our full-year outlook due to the upward revision to first-quarter GDP and our more optimistic view for the second quarter,’ said Fannie Mae Chief Economist Doug Duncan in Fannie Mae’s July Economic Report.”

That strong outlook combined with Freddie’s profits in the second quarter must surely be a shock to some of the naysayers who predicted that the GSEs would not be profitable, chief among them Mortgage Bankers CEO Dave Stevens and Treasury’s Michael Stegman, who is counselor to the Secretary for housing finance policy.

During a March CNBC interview, Stevens said that the GSEs epic profits were one-time events and predicted they would return to “more normalized” earnings:

“But that’s certainly not sustainable for two companies that have virtually no capital and are dependent, ultimately, on these lines of credit that Treasury holds,” he said.

The Washington Post, in an article from February 2014 noting that both GSEs had fully repaid the taxpayers’ for their generous bailout in 2008, reported this from Stegman:

“Besides, the companies’ recent financial performance may ‘overstate’ their financial health, Stegman said. He cited several one-time gains that benefited Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including $10 billion from settlements in lawsuits involving mortgage-backed securities.”

Clearly there’s something going on that’s letting the GSEs post profitable quarters. Could it be that the companies have recovered and have regained their footing in the housing sector to the extent that now their strength is coming through? Of course, all the more reason for Treasury officials like Stegman to continue draining them of their profits by refusing to let them build up their capital buffers.

More from Investors Unite

  • Community Mortgage Lenders Renew Call to Capitalize GSEs
  • FactChecking Michael Stegman
  • Fannie And Freddie: It Was Never An Issue Of Solvency
  • The Whiffs on Discovery Story


Updated on

No posts to display


  1. “which more than repays the $187.5 billion they received in bailout funds a few years ago”. After the GSEs received these funds, where did the funds go, who received 187.5 Billion?

  2. Nobody can tell me these payouts or the conservatorship, at this point, are legal and I’m still waiting for Watt to grow a pair, stop making them and say “sue me” to the government.

Comments are closed.