Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA): Citron Calls It A ‘Stupid Stock’

5
Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA): Citron Calls It A ‘Stupid Stock’

Tesla Motors was a recommended short position of Citron Research a couple of years ago, but the firm later reversed its position. Now Citron has flip-flopped again, reverting back to its short recommendation on the EV manufacturer.

Citron tweets about Tesla (TSLA)

The folks at Citron revealed their reversed position on Tesla in a tweet. They like the automaker’s cars, but they don’t like its stock price.

Hedge Fund Launches Jump Despite Equity Market Declines

Last year was a bumper year for hedge fund launches. According to a Hedge Fund Research report released towards the end of March, 614 new funds hit the market in 2021. That was the highest number of launches since 2017, when a record 735 new hedge funds were rolled out to investors. What’s interesting about Read More

In a statement to Benzinga, Citron Research said Tesla management pulled one of the oldest tricks in the history of Wall Street. The firm pointed out that earlier this year, Tesla lowered its delivery expectations. Then just now, the company ended up meeting the original schedule. In other words, Citron said Tesla pulled “the ultimate Wall St. trick of lowering a bar to just jump over it.”

Tesla (TSLA) reports strong increase in deliveries

This morning Tesla management said Model S deliveries increased 52% year over year in the second quarter, coming to 11,507. They had guided for between 10,000 and 11,000 vehicles sales during the quarter. The percentage of the increase trumps the increases of electric car sales by GM and Nissan by far, reports The Wall Street Journal.

During the first quarter, Tesla delivered 10,045 Model S sedans, and the automaker is still aiming to deliver a total of 55,000 vehicles during the current fiscal years. The company will have to make large strides in the third and fourth quarters in order to meet that goal, as it isn’t even halfway there.

BAML ups price target 177% but remains bearish

Interestingly, analysts at Bank of America Merrill Lynch raised their price target on Tesla Motors by 177%, pushing it up from $65 to $180 per share. They maintained their Underperform rating on the stock, however, adding that they still think the EV manufacturer’s shares are just far too expensive.

The BAML team thinks Tesla could be a successful niche player in the long term as demand for alternative fuel vehicles speeds up. For now though, they think regulators’ push for greater fuel efficiency will mainly be met with lighter, smaller vehicles that are turbocharged and run on gasoline.

The firm remains on a short list of firms that are bearish on Tesla, as many have price targets that are quite bullish. Tesla stock hit an intra-day high of almost $280 per share this morning but then started slipping. As of this writing, shares of Tesla Motors were up 2.49% to $275.86 per share.

Updated on

Michelle Jones is editor-in-chief for ValueWalk.com and has been with the site since 2012. Previously, she was a television news producer for eight years. She produced the morning news programs for the NBC affiliates in Evansville, Indiana and Huntsville, Alabama and spent a short time at the CBS affiliate in Huntsville. She has experience as a writer and public relations expert for a wide variety of businesses. Email her at Mjones@wordpress-785388-2679526.cloudwaysapps.com.
Previous article Belgium Passes Law Against “Vulture Funds”
Next article iPhone 6S: Leaked Foxconn Schematic Reveals Features, Specs

No posts to display

5 COMMENTS

  1. “deleiveries”? “underwhleming”?

    Two spelling errors in one short tweet? It seems like things are going really bad for Citron Research – their hands are shaking…

  2. Research? How about short seller activist blogger:

    Andrew Edward Left is an activist short seller, author and editor of the online investment newsletter Citron Research, formerly StockLemon.com. Wikipedia

    “Author & Editor”… What a joke. He’s a blogger

  3. Allow me to complete the sentence in the title of this article:

    Citron calls TSLA a “stupid stock”… because they lost their asses in multiple short-squeezes’

    Or how about this headline:

    ‘Bitter little Citron writes fictitious hit piece on TSLA in a pathetic attempt to influence stock price in favor of their short position to prevent getting the shit squeezed out of them again’

    Stupid Citron.

  4. Seems like Citron Research is the “STUPID” one here. I love it when shorts get burnt like toast and blame everything but themselves.
    Heheheeheheheh

Comments are closed.