Bruce / Caitlyn Jenner Debate: Avoid The 2 Extremes

1
Bruce / Caitlyn Jenner Debate: Avoid The 2 Extremes

As a journalist, when it comes to debates like the controversy surrounding Caitlyn Jenner (formerly Bruce Jenner), I try to stay out of it. However, when someone asks me to write an op-ed piece about these issues, as a Christian, I can’t say no. So let’s talk about it.

This is a topic I have mixed feelings about. For some perspective, I happen to have a friend I was close to in college who is now trans but still has my full respect as a human being.

Play Quizzes 4

Jenner’s rise to (even more) fame

The somewhat risqué Vanity Fair cover which sparked the debate features the prominent headline: “Call Me Caitlyn” and a photo of former Olympian Bruce Jenner, now known as Caitlyn Jenner, following facial feminization surgery.

How A Weakening PE Market Serves As Another Sign Of A Weakening Economy

InvestAmid the turmoil in the public markets and the staggering macroeconomic environment, it should come as no surprise that the private markets are also struggling. In fact, there are some important links between private equity and the current economic environment. A closer look at PE reveals that the industry often serves as a leading indicator Read More

Jenner quickly rose in popularity on Twitter, surpassing 2 million followers and setting a new record of reaching 1 million followers in only four hours.

So what do we make of this?

Two extremes in the trans debate

Unfortunately many churches err on one of two extremes. Some turn their backs on the trans and homosexual community entirely, cutting off contact with them and in some cases even expressing all-out hatred toward members of the community (I refer to Westboro Baptist Church, which by the way, does not represent true Christian beliefs through its actions). Others do not speak the truth at all but simply go for what is popular rather than what the Bible, which they claim to believe in, says on these issues.

But Christians are called to “speaking the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15).” Does this mean that we should be at either of these two extremes? I would argue not.

All of us mess up

In the Biblical view of the trans debate (and of some other religions as well), it is a sin. But we “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23).” Or to put it in non-religious terms, we all have messed up and will continue to mess up from time to time (whether or not you believe opting to go trans is wrong). God sees no sin or mistake as being worse than another, so for churches to shun the trans / homosexual community is just wrong. Speaking hatred against members of the community is also wrong and contrary to Biblical teaching.

But does this mean that Christians shouldn’t repeat what the Bible says if they truly believe everything it says? No, because we are called to share the Gospel, but there are ways to speak of beliefs without being hateful and combative.

All of us make mistakes

When Jesus walked the earth, he spent time with what people of the day called “sinners.” Any person on the planet would fall into this category. He did not speak hatred to them or shun them. Christians are told to follow His example.

(And for those who think Jesus was just a good man or good teacher, consider how this can’t be possible. He healed the sick and spoke love, so He certainly seems “good” by the world’s standards. But if someone claims to be the Son of God and God incarnate (the “God-man”) but isn’t, they’re either a total lunatic or a horrific liar. How can either of these other two choices mean He is “good”?)

Discrimination?

For those who believe there is no way to disagree with the trans community in love, consider this. It’s easy to call Christians “bigots” just because they believe differently than you. However, it’s nearly impossible to call someone a bigot without yourself being a bigot.

Those who accuse people who politely disagree with them of discrimination (although I would argue rightfully so in the case of those who speak hatred against others) themselves are guilty of discrimination against religious beliefs.

This is an op-ed piece and does not necessarily reflect the overall views of ValueWalk.

Updated on

Michelle Jones is editor-in-chief for ValueWalk.com and has been with the site since 2012. Previously, she was a television news producer for eight years. She produced the morning news programs for the NBC affiliates in Evansville, Indiana and Huntsville, Alabama and spent a short time at the CBS affiliate in Huntsville. She has experience as a writer and public relations expert for a wide variety of businesses. Email her at Mjones@wordpress-785388-2679526.cloudwaysapps.com.
Previous article Passive Versus Active Investing: Is It Better To Index?
Next article Google Staff Are Still Mainly White Men

No posts to display

1 COMMENT

  1. churches should make a clear distinction between visitors and members. ALL (including the gay community) should be welcomed in and treated with kindness). But those desiring to follow Christ and also become members would be (hopefully with gentleness and tact) held to a higher standard.

    Thus, for instance, people living together (hetero or gay) would be gently told that it’s not a good practice for christians. The most tactful of church leaders should be doing this gentle correction. The best choices might be people who once walked down a similar path as the new christian who is asking for membership.

Comments are closed.