Warren Buffett: Stoicism And The Art Of Portfolio Intervention

Warren Buffett: Stoicism And The Art Of Portfolio Intervention
By Mark Hirschey (Work of Mark Hirschey) [<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0">CC BY-SA 2.0</a>], <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AWarren_Buffett_KU_Visit.jpg">via Wikimedia Commons</a>

Stoicism And The Art Of Portfolio Intervention by Burgundy Asset Management

Warren Buffett and other successful quality/value investors have given us a capital compounding system that works. But few follow the program. In this issue of The View from Burgundy, we will outline some reasons why so few mimic these great investors. For those who want to, we will suggest some investing principles that should be agreed upon before implementing a similar approach. Finally, we will use these principles to develop a portfolio intervention protocol to help us execute the system on a day-to-day basis.

Quality / Value Investing Works – So Why Are There Skeptics?

Warren Buffett’s system is simple. Identify a handful of franchise businesses – those with persistent competitive advantages and great management.

Wait for them to get cheap, then buy them. And almost never sell. It has worked like a charm, but if it really is so simple, why don’t more investors mimic him?

Despite 60% Loss On Shorts, Yarra Square Up 20% In 2020

Yarra Square Investing Greenhaven Road CapitalYarra Square Partners returned 19.5% net in 2020, outperforming its benchmark, the S&P 500, which returned 18.4% throughout the year. According to a copy of the firm's fourth-quarter and full-year letter to investors, which ValueWalk has been able to review, 2020 was a year of two halves for the investment manager. Q1 2021 hedge fund Read More

There are two reasons:

1. Some may not agree that this is the best investment system

2. Investors get blown off track while trying to implement it

Let’s handle each of these in turn.

First, there are those who may not agree that Warren Buffett’s quality/value approach is optimal. Some feel it is not complicated enough. How can anything so simple be the right way to approach something as complex as investing? When we are sick, we would much rather take an expensive batch of pills, with side effects, than eat well, rest and let the body’s natural predilection for self-healing work. That is too simple.

The same is true with investing. We would rather jump in and out of stocks and the market, and invest in complex instruments and alternative investments with high fees, because we are convinced that investment success must involve some very sophisticated solutions. By nature, humans are suckers for sophistication.

Second, others who disagree with the Buffett approach feel that they can do a lot better. Humans are famously overconfident – 90% of us think we are better-than-average drivers.i The fact that none of us are as rich as Warren Buffett doesn’t seem to matter.

Maybe it should. But it is tough to change our minds, even when compelling evidence is presented. Humans tend to prefer their own views and discount anything that does not confirm their biases. Instead we seek out confirming data, even if it is spurious.

“I believe therefore I see,”ii rather than the other way around. But make no mistake, the evidence that the Warren Buffett system works is compelling.

The first evidence is Buffett’s track record. He has created a $50-billion fortune in one lifetime of investing, from scratch. He has also not been shy along the way about telling us how he’s doing it – by owning quality stocks.

Evidence that quality investing works also comes from recently published studies. A paper published in the Financial Analysts Journal in 2011 concluded that over the past 41 years, lower-risk (i.e., higher-quality) stocks substantially outperformed higher-risk stocks. A June 2012 white paper by Boston-based investment firm GMO entitled “Profits for the Long Run: Affirming the Case for Quality” came to the same conclusion.

So, even as quality approaches like Warren Buffett’s pass the tests of time and academia, many people still retain their own views, expecting that they will be the exception that proves the rule. Most are still waiting.

A final reason people disagree with using the Warren Buffett system is that they cannot sit on their hands. Humans have an overwhelming compulsion to act. For most of us, Franklin D. Roosevelt summed up our core instincts when he famously chided that we should, “least of all, do something.” The Buffett buy-and-hold system, which relies on a large dose of “lethargy bordering on sloth,” seems counterintuitive. Instead, we are programmed to take action, despite the evidence that almost all of our investment actions subtract value.

Let’s now turn to those investors who buy into Warren Buffett’s simplicity, but get blown off course. There are lots of things that can upset the investing apple cart, like macro events causing perceptions about increased investment risk, volatility in asset and stock prices, and expert advice and predictions contrary to our plan. They could sidetrack Buffett too, of course, but they don’t. He seems to understand when to perform a portfolio intervention and when to stand pat.

See full PDF below.

No posts to display