John Rogers On Contrarian And Disciplined Approach via Ticker
Good-quality companies, when purchased at a reasonable price to their long-term earnings capacity, can generate significant gains for shareholders. Over the last three decades, John Rogers, Jr., Chairman and CEO of Ariel Investments, has rarely wavered from this principle. With the additional support of a stable research team, he has infused the stock selection process of its flagship fund with the company’s discipline in buying stocks trading at a discount to intrinsic value.
What is the history of the company and the fund?
GrizzlyRock Value Partners was up 16.6% for the first quarter, compared to the S&P 500's 5.77% gain and the Russell 2000's 12.44% return. GrizzlyRock's long return was 22.3% gross, while its short return was -2.9% gross. Compared to the Russell 2000, the fund's long portfolio delivered alpha of 10.8%, while its short portfolio delivered alpha Read More
The firm and its flagship fund, Ariel Fund, have a long history spanning across three decades. We are very proud of our history and the long-term record, because we have worked hard to build a strong culture and keep our research team together—something rare in our industry.
We are contrarian and independent thinkers. When the Internet bubble was peaking at the turn of the century, there was a lot of pressure on our core values to start chasing the hot stocks of the day and ignore value. However, we did not follow the crowd, because we not only felt that technology stocks were overvalued, but also believed in our value investment principles.
In 2008, an investor could become a true contrarian and buy his favorite stocks at bargain prices. We bought more of our favorite companies during that time, which has been a key driver for our performance to date (both short and long term).
Have you changed your investing style in those thirty years?
Initially, we focused primarily on small- and mid-size companies, but mid-cap companies have evolved over the years. In the beginning, you could find a lot of smaller, high-quality companies. Despite their small size, these companies could be at the top of their fields. However, many industries consolidated over the years, and nowadays, the smaller gems are fewer, while the mid-cap space seems to offer more opportunities. We look for companies that are high quality and a good value at the same time.
How would you describe your investment philosophy?
Our philosophy is to blend value investment principles with our selection of high-quality companies, which we find most often in the mid-cap universe. We believe that a really great business has a wide moat around it that inhibits new competition.
We look for companies that we can own for years, and we feel confident that they will still be leaders in their industries with high returns on capital, high profit margins and consistent growth rates.
I would say that we follow a value investment style popularized by Warren Buffett. We always read his letters and have been attending Berkshire Hathaway annual meetings for many years.
This learning has helped us not only sharpen our commitment to value investment principles, but also deliver outstanding returns for our shareholders.
What is your investment strategy and process?
Since we are looking for companies with strong balance sheets, we have our own proprietary ratings to ensure strong financial characteristics. We look for a quality, dynamic management team, and we spend a lot of time getting to know management.
Our strategy is oriented to running a concentrated portfolio with approximately 40 names or less. As we aim to be true experts in the industries in which we invest, we do not try to own a lot of everything. I believe that to make successful decisions in an industry, an investor has to know the companies extraordinarily well. The overarching theme is focus.
When buying stocks, we look for a significant discount to our estimate of intrinsic value of the business, which means a discount of at least 40 percent. With a detailed cash flow analysis of the company, we attempt to estimate what a financial or strategic buyer would pay for the entire company.
The stocks we buy should also be cheap on an earnings multiple basis. Here, we look for companies selling for less than 13 times next year’s earnings.
What is your research process and how do you look for opportunities?
We are open to ideas from all kinds of sources. To begin with, we read business publications, newspapers and reports from the brokerage firms. We also like to study and understand what our peers own.
Our group of analysts also searches for ideas. Each of our analysts is very experienced and covers one to two sectors. Our small but tightly knit team has been together nearly since inception. This type of stability in our research organization has helped us keep a lot of knowledge in-house, and we have been seasoned by going through severe markets and economic cycles together. We meet with companies and competitors alike. We screen for ideas within the industry, looking for companies that may be trading down significantly from their 52-week highs or closely approaching their 52-week lows. These companies should have high returns on both assets and investments, as well as free cash flow through several different types of market cycles. We will avoid companies with high leverage on their balance sheets because even good companies or industries can go through challenging times.
Could you give us some specific examples of stocks that you own? How did you find them?
A good example would be WMS Industries Inc, a gambling company that makes slot machines and systems for casinos. We have known the company since the late 1990s. Originally, we shied away from the gambling slot maker because it was highly leveraged and its market space was crowded.
We owned a company called International Game Technology at least three different times in its history as a public company before it was acquired by an Italian lottery operator. IGT was the largest player in the space and had a good record until a change in management occurred. The new management team was not nearly as good, so we started looking for other companies within the same industry. We had been meeting with IGT and attending the G2E gaming conference in Las Vegas for many years, which gave us a better understanding of the competitive marketplace.
At the same time, WMS was trading at a high valuation for a long period of time. We patiently waited for the opportunity, and when the company missed its projected earnings for a few quarters, we were able to initiate a position at an attractive price. Subsequently, a year later, the company was acquired at a higher price than we paid.
See full PDF below.