Denali Investors 2009 Annual Meeting [Slides]

Denali Investors‘ slides from the 2009 annual meeting.

An Uncommon Fund…

  • Modeled after the original Warren Buffett
  • Partnerships hedge fund of the 1950’s
  • Value-Based
  • Special Situations
  • Opportunistic
  • Concentrated
  • Net Cash

Our framework is rare in today’s world

Overview

Objective: Produce superior long-term absolute and relative returns versus the S&P index

Morningstar Investment Conference: Using Annuities In A Portfolio For Added Stability

portfolioOver the past decade, annuities have fallen out of favor with investors. These retirement products became popular in the US during the Great Depression when potential retirees were looking for a secure income stream that would be unaffected by stock market volatility. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more If you’re looking for value Read More


Strategy: Combine “Generals” and “Workouts”; Focus on identifying value-based investment ideas and margin of safety

Portfolio: Build a portfolio of 5 – 15 very attractive, non-market correlated investment ideas which have high conviction through fundamental research

“Generals” + “Workouts”

Generals

  • Undervalued stocks
  • Neglected
  • Long time horizon
  • Favorable risk/reward
  • Shorts
  • Flawed business, management
  • Unrealistic expectations
  • Negative catalysts

Workouts

  • Non-recurring; Catalyst
  • Internal/External
  • Mergers
  • Tender Offers
  • Spin-offs
  • Capital Structure Arbitrage
  • Reorganizations
  • Liquidations
  • Bankruptcies

Flexible search for opportunities…

Investment Philosophy

Value: Buy Cheaply. Invest at steep discounts to intrinsic (business) value

Fundamentals: Be an Owner. Approach investments as an owner of a business, rather then chasing momentum or technicals

Concentration: Be Selective. A handful of great, highconviction ideas is better than a hundred mediocre ones

Long-term View: Use Time. Patient long-term investing creates a distinct advantage over short-term speculation

Net Cash: Don’t Risk Ruin. Leverage is hazardous no matter the number of PhD’s

Deal Background

Precision Drilling (PDS) buys Grey Wolf (GW)

  • GW and PDS announced a merger in Aug 2008
  • Tail end of an energy boom.
  • The election merger consideration for each GW share was either 1) $9.02 in cash per share, or 2) 0.4225 share of PDS. Election subject to proration.
  • By December 2008, in combination with the market market, GW traded down from $9 per share to about $6 per share. PDS from $20 – 25 to $6 – 7 per share.

An opportunity hiding in plain sight…

Possible Outcomes

Outcome Band includes:

  • The deal closes (PDS buys GW)
  • The deal breaks (PDS does not buy GW)
  • GW shareholder makes cash election
  • GW shareholder makes share election
  • GW shareholder makes no election (defaults to share election)

Something in between…

Ways to Place an Investment The Approach…

“Short” GW & hedge PDS

  • Counterintuitive (typical to long target / short acquirer)
  • Tactics are critical
  • Standard merger arb analysis on GW alone is limited
  • Insurance/hedge “cost”
  • Combination increases safety
  • “The Ratio” – 1/10 risk/reward ratio

See full PDF below.