China-Japan Before China-Taiwan by EconMatters
Some long time readers probably know I occasionally write about Asian geopolitics related to China and Taiwan. Since Taiwan typically goes under the radar of major news media, I usually google browse both Chinese and English news about Taiwan. Over the weekend, I came across one disturbing piece of article by Hugh White who’s a professor of strategic studies at the Australian National University in Canberra. Excerpt below:
[T]he harsh reality is that no country is going to sacrifice its relations with China in order to help Taiwan…… China is simply too important economically, and too powerful militarily, for anyone to confront it on Taiwan’s behalf…….
David Einhorn Buys Three New Stocks: These Are The Names And Theses (Q3 Letter)
David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital funds returned 5.9% in the third quarter of 2020, compared to a gain of 8.9% for the S&P 500 in the same period. This year has been particularly challenging for value investors. Growth stocks have surged as value has struggled. For Greenlight, one of Wall Street's most established value-focused investment funds, Read More
Even more worryingly, this reality does not yet seem to have sunk in in Washington…. Any US effort to support Taiwan militarily against China would be almost certain to escalate into a full-scale US-China war and quite possibly a nuclear exchange. That would be a disaster for everyone….far worse than reunification [for the people of Taiwan itself]…….
Everybody Scares of China?
The article basically tells the world to give a nod of approval to an act of invasion to appease China as everybody is in dire need of China’s money and helpless against China since “China can sink the carriers, and their economies are so intertwined that trade sanctions of the kind the US used against Russia recently are simply unthinkable.”
Judging from the lack of action by the international community against Russia in Russo-Georgian War in 2008 and Crimea in 2014, I should not be too shocked by this kind of defeatist mentality that is all too prevalent. What I find ludicrous is that a university professor specialized in strategic studies would come up with a view so simplistic and as un-strategic as one can get.
White thinks “Taiwanese overestimate the international support they can rely on if Beijing decides to get tough”, but he obviously gives too much credit to China’s resolve to go to war with the U.S. over Taiwan, and under-estimate the alternatives of a non-military war.
Let’s just ask this ‘strategic’ question — Is it even plausible that China would go all nuke on the U.S. over Taiwan?
Nobody Wants A Military War
The fact is that NOBODY, China and U.S. included, wants to go to a military war, let along a nuclear one, regardless what the justification is. In this day and age, non-military alternatives are often employed to avoid an outright war. Look at how Russian economy suffered from sanctions and low oil price directly threatening Putin’s political position (Conspiracy theorists long posit that the current oil price war is actually a pact between Saudi and the U.S. to crush Russia.)
What International Support?
Next, I’m going to respond to White’s comment regarding ‘Taiwanese overestimate the international support’.
Due to the island’s political tension with China for the past 65 years, Taiwan has experienced countless betrayals and back-stabbing by many so-called allies. So Taiwan has long learned not to rely on the ‘international support’, while striving for an independent economy and national defense.
Nothing’s Free in This World
Don’t think for one second that the support from the U.S. in the past 3 Taiwan Strait Crisis as purely honoring the commitment the U.S. made to the people in Taiwan via the Taiwan Relations Act (of course, it’d still look pretty bad if the U.S. were to break its own Congressional Act.)
Bear in mind, the ‘apparent support’ from the U.S. in the form of defense weapon or equipment is not a freebie. In order to beef up its own defense against potential military threat from China, Taiwan’s purchase has benefited many companies in American and European defense industry.
Most importantly, Taiwan has something the U.S. needs.
As noted in our previous post, currently, the U.S. can’t really do anything about China’s increasing military and financial (i.e. AIIB) influence over the region. But U.S. has a gaping hole in its regional defense layer exposing U.S. Guam, Hawaii, even the U.S. West Coast to direct threat from China. Taiwan is the only friendly suitable and effective response to China plugging that hole in the U.S. regional defense network.
The continued existence of Taiwan (or the Republic of China) as a free, democratic and independent state is a chess move the entire international community, not just the U.S. cannot afford not to make.
China-Japan Before China-Taiwan
My observation is that China would leave Taiwan status quo as long as Beijing ‘feels’ Taiwan is part of China. So China may become difficult with Taiwan’s presence in international settings, and may act aggressively towards any local island independent movements, but would unlikely resort to actual military actions against Taiwan.
In fact, the increasing nationalism in Japan, the visit by Japan cabinet members, including Abe, to pay respect to Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine, and the ongoing dispute over diaoyu islands, probably anger China more than Taiwan could ever achieve.
Japan has been a long-time ally of the U.S. who almost always has Japan’s back. So Mr. White should spend more of his energy ‘strategizing’ how Washington and the international community should best handle the ‘delicate’ scenario should a war break out between China and Japan instead of a China-Taiwan scenario in his article.