More Confirmation That Treasury Loves Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac’s Money If Not The GSEs Themselves

5
More Confirmation That Treasury Loves Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac’s Money If Not The GSEs Themselves

Fannie Mae

Photo by NCinDC

More Confirmation That Treasury Loves Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac’s Money If Not The GSEs Themselves by Investors Unite

In two different venues, miles apart, on Tuesday it became clearer that the ongoing conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac serves the twin purposes of providing a revenue stream for the Treasury and guaranteeing that the GSE’s days are done.

Play Quizzes 4

During a House Financial Services Committee hearing on the Treasury’s FY2016 budget, Rep. Michael Capuano, D-MA, asked Treasury Secretary Jack Lew point blank when Treasury was going to stop using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a “piggy bank?”  Capuano noted the GSEs have paid back more than $40 billion on top of what they borrowed during the height of 2008 financial crisis and asked about their capital reserves.

Lew dodged both questions but acknowledged that the payments had become part of the Treasury’s general fund to help reduce the country’s debt.  We can give Lew credit for candor but fortunately Capuano pressed Lew on how long the Administration plans to hold the GSEs “hostage” and forcing homeowners to pay an additional tax.

This Too Value Fund Explains Why Turkey Is Ripe For Investment Right Now

TurkeyThe Talas Turkey Value Fund returned 9.5% net for the first quarter on a concentrated portfolio in which 93% of its capital is invested in 14 holdings. The MSCI Turkey Index returned 13.1% for the first quarter, while the MSCI All-Country ex-USA was down 5.4%. Background of the Talas Turkey Value Fund Since its inception Read More

At that same hour in Roanoke, VA those in attendance at a Ferrum College forum were treated to a history lesson on the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in U.S. housing policy, especially in the turbulent years that led up to 2008 financial crisis. However, the question posed by the event’s title, “U.S. Housing Finance Reform: Can we manage and control taxpayer risk while assuring continued innovation in the market?” remained largely unanswered.

Former Acting Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency Ed DeMarco lauded Congress and Administration officials for meeting the 2008 crisis head-on with the enactment of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the infusion of funds from the  Treasury, and the establishment of conservatorships for the GSEs. He said these steps allowed the secondary housing market to function and recover.

But, if stability and liquidity were so important, why did DeMarco and others sanction the Third Amendment sweep as soon as the GSEs began turning a corner in 2012? This continues to undermine the GSE’s ability to recapitalize and expose the taxpayer to additional losses. DeMarco was not asked that question directly but, as we noted Monday, he puts the onus on Congress to enact meaningful, long-term GSE reform. He lamented that not much has changed on the legislative front and insisted that we still need an act of Congress to bring conservatorship to end.

“When we first put them into conservatorship, I never would have said that we’d still be here six and half years later,” he said.

We can be certain Michael Stegman, a senior Treasury official, would have said the same thing about the need to wait for Congress had he been on hand as a panelist, as planned.  He was unable to attend at the last minute, denying us the chance to again hammer away at his determination to make sure the GSE’s never get again back on their feet.  We can only hope our fact check last week that explained that HERA gave FHFA authority over the GSEs as conservator to bring them to an end after they have been restored to a “sound and solvent” state have raised uncomfortable questions.

Lew’s candor at least provided a glimpse into the Administration’s rationale for justifying the sweep in the first place.  Openness has been in short supply on this issue. During the forum in Roanoke Gretchen Morgenson of the New York Times again expressed concern that the government has gone to great lengths to conceal the rationale for the sweep, going  so far as to exert executive privilege repeatedly to keep documents secret in litigation launched by investors.

“Isn’t the government’s obligation to let the sun shine on its action?” she asked at the end of the forum.

After yesterday, we at least know the government has appreciated the extra money Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provide and will continue to defer to Congress on the fate of the GSEs, HERA notwithstanding. But what happens when there’s nothing left in the piggy bank? Taxpayers and shareholders will have to keep asking this question.

More from Investors Unite

  • It’s A(n Awkward) Celebration!
  • Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Reform: Pressure From The Left
  • HousingWire: CMLA calls on FHFA, Treasury to recapitalize Fannie and Freddie
  • FactChecking Michael Stegman
  • Investors Unite Executive Director Tim Pagliara Responds to Iowa Court Ruling on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Updated on

No posts to display

5 COMMENTS

  1. Agree with SC. The government is using Fannie and Freddie as cash cows. It seems the biggest benefactor of the US financial crisis is the US government that has profited the most!

  2. Govt Loves stealing money from the 20% of Shareholders. Wouldn’t anyone like to steal all profits from all investors? That is what Lew and the Treasury is doing. Where is the SEC protecting Investors rights?

  3. Agree wit SC. The government has used Fannie and Freddie as cash cows for the Treasury. Let them recapitalize and get the hell out of the way!

  4. Lew, Watt, DeMarco, Geithner, and Obama should all go to jail over this blatant theft. Nobody ever brings up the fact that the banks settled lawsuits in excess of $200Bln on TOP of the dividends. Who got all that money and who was rightfully owed that money???? This is so criminal that it’s sickening.

Comments are closed.