‘Brussels Was … Asleep’: Bildt Assesses EU’s Mistakes Regarding Russia

‘Brussels Was … Asleep’: Bildt Assesses EU’s Mistakes Regarding Russia

‘Brussels Was … Asleep’: Bildt Assesses EU’s Mistakes Regarding Russia by EurasiaNet.org

A EurasiaNet Partner Post from: RFE/RL

In an interview with RFE/RL in Brussels, former Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt talks frankly about the mistakes made by the European Union with regard to Russia, what he thinks the Russian president’s next moves are likely to be, and why the bloc needs to engage more deeply with Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia. Bildt spoke on March 22 with RFE/RL’s Rikard Jozwiak on the sidelines of a Brussels Forum held by the German Marshall Fund.

RFE/RL: Looking back at the run-up to the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius in November 2013, all the way up to today, what could the EU have done differently in its policy toward the East?

Qualivian Investment Partners July 2022 Performance Update

stocks performance 1651757664Qualivian Investment Partners performance update for the month ended July 31, 2022. Q2 2022 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Dear Friends of the Fund, Please find our July 2022 performance report below for your review. Qualivian reached its four year track record in December 2021.  We are actively weighing investment proposals. Starting in November Read More

Carl Bildt: I think we should have reacted more strongly towards Russia when they started to misbehave in the summer of 2013. Clearly, when they started the sanctions against Ukraine, we didn’t see clearly the implications of that, and I remember that [former Polish Foreign Minister] Radek [Sikorski] and myself were trying to alert Brussels and Brussels was more or less asleep. Would that have made a difference? I don’t know. But that is clearly a mistake.

RFE/RL: You and Sikorski are not foreign ministers anymore. You were considered to be hawkish towards President Vladimir Putin’s Russia and at the same time strong supporters of the EU’s Eastern Partnership. When you look at the EU today, do you still think there is the same commitment towards the Eastern Partnership and the same hawkishness towards Putin’s Russia?

Bildt: I think that the commitment is clearly there. One of the good things that we did — going back to 2008, because in 2008 two things happened — there was the Union for the Mediterranean and there was the Eastern Partnership. While the French were keen to have the Union Mediterranean with a separate arrangement or whatever, we were keen to make the Eastern Partnership completely integrated with the [EU] institutions. That was very good. It is now solidly part of the EU institutions [in terms of] the calendar and what not. So the commitment is clearly there. I have no doubts about that.

On [your other question], Radek and myself, we were sort of ahead of the game in a sense that we — too late perhaps, but earlier than others — saw what was going to happen, saw where Russia was heading. I think more or less everyone has caught up with us by now. There were those who said that ‘Putin is not going to do this, Putin is not going to do that,’ and since then Putin has done virtually everything. So, unfortunately, I would say we have been proven right.

RFE/RL: Is the EU still behind the curve?

Bildt: That is a difficult question. Because what has been proved the case is that Russia is somewhat more unpredictable. Will Putin, sort of, let his tanks roll in the direction of Odesa and Kyiv? I wouldn’t say that it’s excluded, but I don’t think it is likely at the moment. Do we focus enough attention on trying to find out? We are focusing far more attention now than we used to do. Should we focus more? Yes, I think we should.

RFE/RL: What do you think will be Putin’s next move?

Bildt: I think at the moment he is keen to build up the enclaves — these “people’s republics” virtually without peoples, by the way, but nevertheless — strengthen them militarily. I think he would like them to be able to undertake military operations more on their own because he knows the political price associated with him sending in regular Russian Army time after time is too high. He is waiting to exploit weaknesses either in Ukraine or in the West. He believes that he has time on his side and that the West will get bored with the entire thing.

My best guess — and I am saying this with the reservation that everyone has been wrong, including myself — is that at the moment, for a couple of months, [there will be a] calming down, consolidating, then accusing Ukraine of violating the Minsk agreement, trying to get out of sanctions, hoping there will be division inside Ukraine, hoping there will be divisions inside the West, and then being ready to exploit those weaknesses.

RFE/RL: So what should the EU do right now?

Bildt: I think the most important thing is what was done by the European Council [on March 19-20] — that is, essentially, to say the sanctions [against Russia] are going to be in place all this year. It has not been legally said like that, but politically that was the decision that was taken. I think that is a very good signal. Then I think we should shift focus to strengthen Ukraine in different ways. I think that the IMF program was very important. I think it is important that other countries are coming [forth] on top of that — Sweden did, the U.S. is doing [it], but other European countries should be doing that as well. And then make certain that we truly help them with all the reforms necessary because Ukraine is going to go through a tough time and they need our solidarity, sympathy, and support. These things, I think, are the priorities.”

RFE/RL: The EU Eastern Partnership summit in Riga is coming up in May. Looking at the draft declaration, it looks like it is going to be a very ambitious summit, as such. Should the EU be more ambitious at least towards the three countries — Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine — that are slowly approaching the EU?

Bildt: I think the most important signal coming out of Riga is going to be that we stay the course. There has to be a deeper engagement with the three perhaps in the form of helping them in implementing these [association] agreements. These agreements are very ambitious agreements that will require a lot of efforts by them. I think that they probably need more help than we have envisaged so far in actually doing that.

Then the critical issue is also how we engage with others — what do we do with Armenia? How do we treat Azerbaijan and Belarus in terms of their somewhat lukewarm commitment to human rights, to put it very mildly. That needs to be addressed.

RFE/RL: So, no light at the end of the tunnel? In other words, no EU perspective for them?

Bildt: The light at the end of the tunnel, in my opinion, is there anyhow — Article 49 [of the EU treaty stating that any European country can become a member of the EU] applies. If we talk about a membership perspective, Article 49 of the Treaty of Rome applies. Then there are sort of, as you know, [various] degrees of enthusiasm for that inside the [European] Union and that can only be tested when any of these [aspiring] countries are ready to take that particular step. That is quite a number of years [from now] in the future.

Editor’s note:

Copyright (c) 2015. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

Updated on

No posts to display


  1. Those great debts really knock me out
    They kick the West’s behind
    Angela’s blubbery cellulite is hanging out
    That EU troika is alway on my, my, my mind

    Take me to the Carpathian Mountains way down South
    Let me foreclose your daddy’s farm
    All the way the bankers’ hands are reaching out
    Come and grease your comrade’s palm

    I’m back in the EUSSR,
    You don’t know how lucky you are… boy…
    Back in the EU, back in the EU, back in the EUSSR

  2. Virulently Anti-American: 81 Percent Of Russians Now View The United States Negatively
    Russians view the United States much more unfavorably today than they did during the end of the Cold War era. As you will read about below, an astounding 81 percent of all Russians now view the United States negatively, and only 13 percent have a positive opinion of this country. In all of the years when Russians have been surveyed on their attitudes toward the US, they havenever been this negative.But of course Americans generally do not view the Russian people unfavorably. So why is this happening? Well, it all comes down to the actions of the Obama administration. The Russian people are convinced that US organizations organized, funded and armed the rebels that violently overthrew the democratically-elected Ukrainian government. And once it was overthrown, the Obama administration immediately recognized the rebels as the legitimate government of Ukraine. And now most Russians are convinced that the US government is trying to promote a similar revolution inside Russia. In recent years, the Russian people have become increasingly nationalistic, and at this point they view US meddling in their affairs as a direct threat to their way of life. Even while most Americans are extremely apathetic about what is going on over in Russia, an increasingly large chunk of the Russian population is angry enough to go to war. Russia carried out a successful test of its new Bulava intercontinental nuclear missile on Wednesday and will perform two more test launches in October and November, the head of its naval forces said.The armed forces have boosted their military training and test drills since the start of the conflict in eastern Ukraine, which Russia considers in its traditional sphere of
    influence.The 12-meter long Bulava, or mace, has undergone numerous tests, some successful, and can deliver an impact of up to 100 times the atomic blast that devastated Hiroshima in 1945.
    Naval Commander-in-Chief Admiral Viktor Chirkov said the test launch had been carried out from the White Sea and that the test missile had hit its target in Russia’s far east.”In October and November of this year, the naval fleet will carry out two more launches with two rocket cruisers equipped with ballistic missiles,” Interfax quoted Chirkov as saying.A Bulava missile weighs 36.8 tonnes and can travel 8,000 km (5,000 miles) and hold 6-10 nuclear warheads.