However as Julien Codorniou, Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB)’s platform director for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa explained to Business Insider, the system essentially roots out badly performing ads. The ads are funded by the revenue that they produce, and Codorniou claims that he does not know of any client that is wasting money on ads that don’t generate revenue.
Facebook’s mobile ads: A safe system
In fact it could be argued that the mobile app install ads which are the cause of the controversy could even protect Facebook’s revenues. App creators buy Facebook ads to encourage people to download their product, and are obviously hoping to make more money through sales than what they spend on the ads, in a practice known as direct response advertising. If ads bring companies more business, they will continue to advertise. If not, they stop.
Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) COO Sheryl Sandberg recently attempted to explain this to investors, but it would appear that they didn’t fully understand. Analysts on the Street consistently underestimate Facebook’s revenues, partly because of a lack of understanding of recurring and additional ad business produced by direct response ad buys.
Another factor in Facebook’s favor is that the majority of its biggest advertisers are not venture-capital funded tech startups, but rather huge brand names such as Procter & Gamble, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (LON:BC94) (KRX:0059935), Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT), and Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT). All of these big companies have apps that they want consumers to download.
In conclusion it would seem likely that Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) would see a decline in revenue should a recession hit, but that is because of a general trend towards a decrease in advertising budgets if the wider economy takes a downward turn, and not because of an over-reliance on tech start ups funded by venture capitalists.