Are Dividend Stocks Too Expensive?
June 24, 2014
by Geoff Considine
This Tiger Cub Giant Is Betting On Banks And Tech Stocks In The Recovery
The first two months of the third quarter were the best months for D1 Capital Partners' public portfolio since inception, that's according to a copy of the firm's August update, which ValueWalk has been able to review. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more According to the update, D1's public portfolio returned 20.1% gross Read More
Dividend strategies tend to have a strong value tilt and lower price-to-book (P/B) and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios than the market as a whole. But those strategies can become overvalued. When this occurs – we are currently in such a period – building a high-dividend, low-risk portfolio requires extra care.
Dividend-paying stocks can offer investors consistent income, historical outperformance and lower volatility relative to the market as a whole. In a recent article, I reviewed these characteristics as well as arguments by a number of experts that dividend-focused investing may represent a diluted form of value investing. I concluded that selecting stocks on the basis of dividends is a legitimate strategy, with the caveat that one must also consider measures of valuation such as price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios.
This article takes up that challenge and shows how to construct a high-dividend portfolio that is “cheap” on a value basis.
Larry Swedroe, director of research for the BAM Alliance, a community of more than 130 independent registered investment advisors, and Mebane Faber, portfolio manager at Cambria Investment Management, have expressed concern that U.S. dividend-paying stocks have become expensive in recent years relative to a broader universe of value stocks. Dividend-focused investing is becoming more popular, with the attendant risk that the historical valuation advantages (e.g., that you are buying stocks with low prices relative to fundamentals) will be diluted or entirely erased. The asset flows into dividend-equity strategies – especially domestic stocks – raise the possibility that dividend investing is a crowded trade.
Looking beyond the U.S., the story becomes more nuanced. The yields on a range of sectors in a number of regions exceed those of their U.S. counterparts, but these higher yields come with higher risk. Investors will not be well served by simply chasing yield across borders.
I will review the arguments suggesting that the value advantages of dividend-paying stocks have been diluted. I will then address the crucial question for income investors: Is there a population of stocks that have both attractive yields and valuations comparable to traditional value indexes?
U.S. dividend stocks are relatively expensive compared to a value index
In a recent article, Faber (see Figure 7 in the article) looked at the relative valuation of dividend payers. He found that a portfolio of the 20% top dividend-yielding U.S. large-cap stocks since 1963 consistently traded at lower P/E than the S&P 500. This high-dividend portfolio never traded at higher P/E than the S&P 500 until 2008 but has been consistently trading above it since 2011. This simple but compelling analysis demonstrates that portfolios formed exclusively on the basis of dividend yield have become relatively highly priced, at least since 2008, compared to their historical P/E ratios.
Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to email@example.com.