Omnicom and Publicis Call Off Marriage Amid Cultural Differences

Omnicom and Publicis Call Off Marriage Amid Cultural Differences

As egos and regulatory regimes clashed, the deal between advertising giants Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC) and Publicis Groupe S.A. (ADR) (OTCMKTS:PUBGY) (EPA:PUB) fell by the wayside.

Play Quizzes 4

Omnicom – Publicis: Merger of equals but one firm always rules

The $35 billion merger couldn’t be completed due to “”difficulties in completing the transaction within a reasonable time frame.”  In other words, no one was willing to compromise on key control issues and the legal meter was running, might be one interpretation.

Morningstar Investment Conference: Fund Manager Highlights Personalized Medicine, Energy Security

Clint Carlson Far ViewHedge fund managers go about finding investment ideas in a variety of different ways. Some target stocks with low multiples, while others look for growth names, and still others combine growth and value when looking for ideas. Some active fund managers use themes to look for ideas, and Owen Fitzpatrick of Aristotle Atlantic Partners is Read More

Using typical M&A doublespeak, the merger had been labeled a “merger of equals,” which is absurd.  There is typically a legal advantage given to one side or another in such mergers, otherwise management would be a disaster.  That is particularly the case when two companies have very different management outlooks.

“We still have a lot of complex time-consuming issues that because of different corporate cultures we haven’t been able to resolve,” Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC) CEO John Wren said in an interview in the Wall Street Journal. “There was no finish line in sight and that created uncertainty.”

“Dead end situation”

“For several weeks now, we realized that we were in a dead-end situation and that the best thing would be to turn back and focus again on our own plans,” Publicis Groupe S.A. (ADR) (OTCMKTS:PUBGY) (EPA:PUB) Chief Executive Maurice Levy was quoted in the Journal as saying.

The two companies were known to have very different management styles.  France-based Publicis preferred a centralized model of control while US-based Omnicom preferred a more “devolved” model.

These core differences in philosophical beliefs should have been a warning flag from the start, because the clash of core beliefs was just the start.  Relations between the two sides had severely frayed, the Journal reported, with disagreements stemming from the two CEOs. The primary issue was control.  The two CEOs argued over where the company would be located and which executives would fill top roles. A visible fight had emerged over who would fill the position of finance chief, with both sides digging in.  Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC) executives publically said its CFO, Randy Weisenburger, would get the job while Publicis Groupe S.A. (ADR) (OTCMKTS:PUBGY) (EPA:PUB) executives countered its CFO, Jean-Michel Etienne, would fill the post.

Other issues in the doomed merger were cross-Atlantic regulatory concerns, as delays in obtaining regulatory approval, particularly in China, weighed heavily.

Updated on

Mark Melin is an alternative investment practitioner whose specialty is recognizing a trading program’s strategy and mapping it to a market environment and performance driver. He provides analysis of managed futures investment performance and commentary regarding related managed futures market environment. A portfolio and industry consultant, he was an adjunct instructor in managed futures at Northwestern University / Chicago and has written or edited three books, including High Performance Managed Futures (Wiley 2010) and The Chicago Board of Trade’s Handbook of Futures and Options (McGraw-Hill 2008). Mark was director of the managed futures division at Alaron Trading until they were acquired by Peregrine Financial Group in 2009, where he was a registered associated person (National Futures Association NFA ID#: 0348336). Mark has also worked as a Commodity Trading Advisor himself, trading a short volatility options portfolio across the yield curve, and was an independent consultant to various broker dealers and futures exchanges, including OneChicago, the single stock futures exchange, and the Chicago Board of Trade. He is also Editor, Opalesque Futures Intelligence and Editor, Opalesque Futures Strategies. - Contact: Mmelin(at)
Previous article Bill Sharpe: “Smart Beta Makes Me Sick”
Next article When a Colleague Just Isn’t Listening

No posts to display