If you find it ironic that Fox News icon Bill O’Reilly is arguing for the common good, citing in part environmental benefits of electric cars, you might enjoy this clash of conservatives brought to our attention by market commentator Josh Brown.
Conservative talk show host oddly argues in favor of environment
In his nightly talk show, O’Reilly found himself in the unusual position of defending the government’s investment in Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) against fellow network commentator Eric Boling.
This hedge fund is so optimistic about COVID-19 that they’re short Clorox [In-Depth]
A lot has happened since the coronavirus pandemic began, but aside from the temporary selloff in March, the stock market has continued to hum along as if nothing has been happening. There's no denying that the financial markets have been changed by the pandemic, and investors should be thinking differently when it comes to investing Read More
It’s interesting to watch this debate because it doesn’t fit neatly into the predictable and often boring traditional right / left, conservative / liberal dialogue, a point Brown alluded to in a blog post and the topic of a new book by Ralph Nader that says factions from both the right and left are re-defining political lines.
Tesla: First car not powered by gasoline to receive Motor Trend car of the year
The segment begins by noting that for the first time in its history, Motor Trend awarded its car of the year award to a vehicle that didn’t have a gas engine. O’Reilly points out Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA)’s business model, even though the car is expensive now, could be a game changer if mass produced. “If the air in Denver, New York, LA is cleaner,” Tesla has a significant value, O’Reilly said. “The Tesla is a ground zero non-polluter. If everyone drove (a Tesla) the air would be cleaner in the country.”
It is here that Boling argues with O’Reilly that the electricity produces pollution from coal and “oil fired” electricity. On average pollution from electricity is much less mile per mile than that produced by a car. But never mind the facts, Boling continued with his rant, interrupting O’Reilly except when red meat conservative issues were put on the table.
“Do you like Opec?” O’Reilly asked. “Do you like Putin?”
“No,” was Boling’s to Opec, but he was less sure of Putin.
If the country is strengthened, O’Reilly reasoned, and if the bad guys such as Opec and Putin are hurt – all while helping the economy – this is the definition of a win-win situation.
Boling’s argument is the government is still paying a subsidy to every Tesla owner of between $7,500 to $15,000 in tax rebates, on top of loaning the company $500 million to get off the ground, to which O’Reilly consistently said “the loan was repaid.”
“The lesson is here is not to get too caught up in any political affiliation – especially not to the point where it becomes a religion for you,” Brown said in a blog post reflecting on the somewhat bizarre exchange. “Stay intellectually loose.”
Ralph Nader, in his book Unstoppable, tells a similar story about “how an emerging right / left alliance will change the corporate state.” Watching the O’Reilly debate couldn’t help but remind one that a change in the tired right / left political argument could be emerging.