Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA) Sued By Auto Dealers In Ohio

Tesla stockBlomst / Pixabay

Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) continues to battle for the right to sell its vehicles directly to consumers. The automaker has been wrangling with dealerships in Ohio for some time, and now a trade group for dealers in the state is suing Tesla, saying that its sales model is in violation of state law there.

Tesla accused of violating Ohio laws

The Columbus Dispatch reports that along with Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA), the plaintiffs named the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles and also the Ohio Department of Public Safety. The suit was filed by the Ohio Automobile Dealers Association, the Midwestern Auto Group of Dublin, a number of dealerships run by the Germain family and the Ricart Automotive Group of Groveport.

The plaintiffs are attempting to get a court in Franklin County, Ohio to retract Tesla’s license for selling new vehicles.

Tesla faces “bullying”

Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) Associate General Counsel James Chen told The Columbus Dispatch, “This is the same kind of bullying from the dealers we’ve faced in other states. The dealers, when they’re defeated in the court of public opinion, in the media and in the legislature, they then go to the courts.”

Earlier this month, Ohio dealerships attempted to get an amendment passed in the Ohio General Assembly. That amendment failed. It would have made it illegal for Tesla to sell its vehicles directly to consumers in Ohio.

Is Tesla’s license legal in Ohio?

Chen noted that it seems “hypocritical” for auto dealers in Ohio to claim that Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA)’s sales model is illegal while at the same time also attempting to get lawmakers to pass an amendment to make it illegal.

Auto dealers’ new tactic is just another way to push the automaker to use dealerships. It claims that Tesla’s license to sell new vehicles in Ohio was improperly approved because the automaker didn’t include a copy of the contract with the manufacturer regarding the vehicles to be sold. Auto dealerships claim that even though in this case the dealer and the manufacturer are the same company, it still must show a contract.

Does Tesla need a contract with itself?

So in other words, they want Tesla to make a contract with itself. Auto dealers also claim that the law requires an agreement between “two separate contracting parties,” and since Tesla isn’t two parties, its sales model is not legal. Chen says the argument twists around the law’s intent. At this point there haven’t been any hearings scheduled in the case. Court officials say this kind of case usually goes to a hearing within a month.

Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) has faced similar battles with auto dealerships in other states. The automaker has won some of those cases and lost a few others. It said it would take the fight to the federal level if it continues to see problems at the state level. A petition posted over the summer requested that the White House make a recommendation on the topic. The petition did get enough signatures to warrant an official White House response. However, it doesn’t look like the White House ever responded.

Shares of Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) declined 2% in premarket trading this morning.

For exclusive info on hedge funds and the latest news from value investing world at only a few dollars a month check out ValueWalk Premium right here.

Multiple people interested? Check out our new corporate plan right here (We are currently offering a major discount)

About the Author

Michelle Jones
Michelle Jones was a television news producer for eight years. She produced the morning news programs for the NBC affiliates in Evansville, Indiana and Huntsville, Alabama and spent a short time at the CBS affiliate in Huntsville. She has experience as a writer and public relations expert for a wide variety of businesses. Michelle has been with ValueWalk since 2012 and is now our editor-in-chief. Email her at Mjones@valuewalk.com.

9 Comments on "Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA) Sued By Auto Dealers In Ohio"

  1. Shows how frightened they are of Elon Musk, i think these traditional thinking auto companies better get their heads out of their rear ends and learn from what Musk is doing. I’m sure they are trying to do to him what was done to Tucker.

  2. I guess dealers are behave slimmy even when your arent haggling with them for hours on the 15% markup they think they have a God-given right to charge you.

  3. would you rather pay 15% markup to have the priviledge of the dreaded dealership experience, or save that 15%, avoid the slimy dealership “let me talk to my manager routine” and buy a car directly frim Tesla at a beautiful department store?

  4. I don’t understand why Tesla doesn’t form a separate corporation that owns all its dealerships and sell exclusively through them. That would get rid of these cheap tactics by dealerships.

  5. This is Ohio dealers you are talking about. Especially the BIG ones. They are pretty bad. I wouldn’t buy car from them in any case.


  7. I’m never buying from a car dealer the rest of my life. The whole thing needs to die.

  8. let me know which dealers are suing. I will make sure not to visit them again.

  9. Wow, as an Ohio citizen, I’m really getting annoyed. First, the Cincinnati Street Car/Mayor Cranley spat, now this? The Ohio Auto Dealers lost this battle last month and now they want to sue Tesla over a business model? That’s like suing the guy who got the job over me because he went to a better school. And suing various state agencies? Insanity. I hope the dealers lose a lot of money in this battle. I don’t own a Tesla, nor do I plan on for some time, but this debate is getting childish.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.