Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has been cleared from the allegation that the company indecorously collected and shared customers’ personal information. U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh cleared the iPhone maker, citing the fact that the petitioners could not prove that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) misrepresented any fact or that they have suffered any harm.
Plaintiffs failed to prove any harm from Apple policies
“Plaintiffs must be able to provide some evidence that they saw one or more of Apple’s alleged misrepresentations, that they actually relied on those misrepresentations, and that they were harmed thereby,” Koh said in the November 25 ruling. This case is one among 19 related cases all over the country which are being looked at by Judge Koh.
A Look Back At Warren Buffett’s Best and Worst Oil & Gas Investments
Warren Buffett is perhaps best known for his large investments in some of the world's most recognizable brands, companies like Coca-Cola, American Express and Apple. Q1 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Companies that fit into this bracket seem to fall squarely within his circle of competence. They sell a product that's easy to Read More
Scott Kamber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, told Bloomberg that they are not satisfied with the decision, and discussion is being held to evaluate other options. He added that Judge Koh cleared Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) of the charges because the company claimed that there is no injury.
Plaintiffs claimed damages
The plaintiffs claimed that they had to bear the damages by paying more money for the iPhones and by losing storage space apart from other issues, as per the court document.
Google also faced similar charges
Earlier, Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) was also cleared from similar charges where the judge ruled that the company’s Cookie-tracking practices have not caused any harm to the plaintiffs. A few weeks back, Google agreed to pay $17 million for claims around 36 states and the District of Columbia accepting that it breached the user privacy when circumventing the tracking cookie blockers in Apple’s Safari browser.
The case is in Apple Inc. iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation, 11-md-02250, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).