A new study finds that, contrary to popular belief, rebalancing your portfolio will not generate returns greater than you would have earned otherwise. A rebalance of your Portfolio of course does however help to maintain a more diversified asset pool.
It is widely claimed by both academics and practitioners that periodic rebalancing of portfolios to keep asset weights constant will directly boost geometric returns by buying on downticks and selling on upticks. This paper demonstrates that this is not the case by showing that comparable improvements arise even without rebalancing. This misattribution of returns has important implications for investors since, far from being beneficial, rebalancing is likely to be costly. Specifically, volatility pumping is a strategy which appears to benefit from high asset volatility and large rebalancing trades. We show that the real source of return on such strategies is an implied risk premium on these assets, and that volatility unambiguously reduces expected terminal wealth.