James Dimon has succeeded in his quest to keep both the CEO and Chairman role. What became a media frenzy, we found a bit boring and lame. As we noted, many other large financial companies have a dual CEO/Chairman (see chart below). Putting that aside, for some reason pundits believed if the roles were separated corporate governance would improve at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM). This seems unlikely but aside what happens now?
First a summary of JPMorgan vote on James Dimon
Preliminary voting results suggest that Proposal #6 (Separation of CEO and Chairman roles) has been rather convincingly voted down. In fact, the proposal garnered less support at the 2013 meeting than the previous year, indicating more broad-based support for the current scope of the combined CEO/Chairman role.
Blue Mountain Credit Fund still in the red YTD; here are their biggest holdings
Blue Mountain Credit Alternatives Fund was up 0.36% for November, although the fund remains well into the red for the year. For the first 11 months, the fund was down 24.85% gross. Q3 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Blue Mountain's fundamental credit strategy was up 0.63% for November, including a 1.09% gain for Read More
Given James Dimon’s successful stewardship of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM), many believe that fewer disruptions to his role ultimately benefits JPM and its shareholders.
JPM shareholders vote to keep CEO and Chairman roles consolidated.
James Dimon will keep both the Chairman and CEO titles, as the proposal to separate the two roles actually received less support than the prior year (32.2% vs. ~40% in 2012), indicating the appetite to create an independent Chairman position was probably lower than recent press reports would have suggested.
Analysts at Sterne Agee believe that JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) is an organization with proven management talent that has routinely navigated difficult waters, with impressive success, notably the depths of the financial crisis. The organization has a long-established track record, proven business model and earnings power, as well as the proven ability of management to execute both in good times, as well as times of crisis. Although the prosperity has not been uninterrupted (such has the disclosed CIO losses in 2Q12), management’s stewardship of the company has been exemplary, particularly when compared to similarly situated peers.
Composition of the board remains intact, although several directors get significant “no” votes.
Overall, all nine of the current directors won a plurality of shareholder votes. However, three of the directors saw a significant drop in shareholder support vs. last year’s results. Honeywell International Inc. (NYSE:HON) Chairman and CEO David Cote’s vote dropped to 59.3% (from 97%), Henry Crown and Co. President James Crown dropped to 57.4% (from 97%) and Ellen Futter, President and Trustee of the American Museum of Natural History dropped to 53.1% (from 86%). The remainder of the directors all received in excess of 90% shareholder approval.
Focus on fundamentals an incremental benefit to JPM shares.
With the drama surrounding James Dimon’s role now settled, the incremental headline risk associated with a potential management re-shuffling should subside, with an increased investor focus on the company’s otherwise solid operating results. The outlook for JPM’s underlying business units remains favorable under otherwise challenging circumstances, particularly asset management, large corporate / middle market lending and investment banking. Overall, the company continues to deliver shareholder returns, with a mid-teens operating ROTCE in 1Q13, and double digit earnings and tangible book value growth expected for full-year 2013.
Further reading JPMorgan CIO Scores Home Run on UK RMBS