Central Bank Actions, Uncertainty, and Diversification

Central Bank Actions, Uncertainty, and Diversification
<a href="https://pixabay.com/users/gritti/">gritti</a> / Pixabay

Central Bank Actions, Uncertainty, and Diversification

If some is good, then more is better.  That’s the way simpleminded people think.

Think of alcohol.  A little is good, but past a certain point, more is bad.

Odey Special Situations Fund took on several new positions in March

Crispin OdeyOdey Asset Management's Special Situations Fund was down 3.2% in March, compared to its benchmark, the MSCI World USD Index, which was up 3.3%. Through the end of March, the fund is up 8.7%, beating the benchmark's return of 4.9%. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Odey's Special Situations Fund deploys arbitrage and Read More

I think about central banking the same way.  Until recently, quantitative easing seemed to stimulate the economy, but each increasing dose has done less.  The last one seemed not to work at all, and long rates rose amid buying of bonds by the Fed.

The same applies to running deficits.  Perhaps the Keynesian solution works when there is adequate borrowing capacity in the private sector, but when many cannot borrow more, running high deficits may scare businessmen and consumers, because they wonder whether the system is stable or not, how the books will eventually balance, etc.  Inflation, deflation, higher taxes, currency depreciation… there are so many possibilities.

The leaders in simple-mindedness are Ben Bernanke, and Shinzo Abe of Japan.  Add in George Bush, Jr., and Barack Obama — deficits don’t matter.  They are like Fat Freddy with a hammer; every problem looks like a nail, and he will whack it with his hammer.  BAM!  It’s better, right?

Economies are complex because people are complex, and groups of people are even more complex.  The simplistic tools of neoclassical macroeconomics do not work in situations where there is too much debt, but the ideologues display confidence to the watching world.

When this pattern breaks it will be ugly, and I don’t know when or how it will be ugly.  It all depends on whether policymakers move to inflate or deflate.  You might say, “Of course they will inflate.”  Many thought that in the Great Depression, and they were wrong.

My main point here is that we all know less than we think about the future.  We have no idea as to what might finally derail the policy monoculture of the dominant nations — large deficits and loose monetary policy, but it will derail, and how it will resolve is a mystery.

So diversify your asset allocation into things that benefit from inflation and deflation — maybe you will keep something after the crisis hits.  After all, the looser monetary policy is, the worse the adjustment when the tightening comes, and monetary policy has never been looser than this since 1790.

By David Merkel, CFA of Aleph Blog

Previous article Health Insurance Woes of Blacks [INFOGRAPH]
Next article Galaxy S4 vs. Galaxy S3: What’s New, Samsung?
David J. Merkel, CFA, FSA — 2010-present, I am working on setting up my own equity asset management shop, tentatively called Aleph Investments. It is possible that I might do a joint venture with someone else if we can do more together than separately. From 2008-2010, I was the Chief Economist and Director of Research of Finacorp Securities. I did a many things for Finacorp, mainly research and analysis on a wide variety of fixed income and equity securities, and trading strategies. Until 2007, I was a senior investment analyst at Hovde Capital, responsible for analysis and valuation of investment opportunities for the FIP funds, particularly of companies in the insurance industry. I also managed the internal profit sharing and charitable endowment monies of the firm. From 2003-2007, I was a leading commentator at the investment website RealMoney.com. Back in 2003, after several years of correspondence, James Cramer invited me to write for the site, and I wrote for RealMoney on equity and bond portfolio management, macroeconomics, derivatives, quantitative strategies, insurance issues, corporate governance, etc. My specialty is looking at the interlinkages in the markets in order to understand individual markets better. I no longer contribute to RealMoney; I scaled it back because my work duties have gotten larger, and I began this blog to develop a distinct voice with a wider distribution. After three-plus year of operation, I believe I have achieved that. Prior to joining Hovde in 2003, I managed corporate bonds for Dwight Asset Management. In 1998, I joined the Mount Washington Investment Group as the Mortgage Bond and Asset Liability manager after working with Provident Mutual, AIG and Pacific Standard Life. My background as a life actuary has given me a different perspective on investing. How do you earn money without taking undue risk? How do you convey ideas about investing while showing a proper level of uncertainty on the likelihood of success? How do the various markets fit together, telling us us a broader story than any single piece? These are the themes that I will deal with in this blog. I hold bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Johns Hopkins University. In my spare time, I take care of our eight children with my wonderful wife Ruth.

No posts to display