Fiscal and Monetary Policy Crossroads


Fiscal and Monetary Policy Crossroads

This is a confusing time:

  • Lousy fiscal policy — way too much borrowing by the government
  • Lousy monetary policy — way too much expansion of the monetary base, and for little good reason, and funding the deficits of the government as a result…
  • Negative real interest rates on Treasuries 15 years out; that is financial repression, and that can’t happen without the Treasury and Fed conspiring to do so.
  • Low equity market valuations, but only because profit margins are abnormally high.  There are reasons to think that profit margins will not mean-revert this time, because the increase in the global capitalist labor pool is depressing wages.  Wages may remain low for a longer time than many expect.  Sorry to the laborers, but there are more of you than the globe can accommodate.  Thus I remain agnostic on high profit margins; let’s revisit the issue when wage rates rise.

Personally, I think that the fiscal multiplier is negative.  Spend money on government projects, many of which do not build value for the economy, and the economy grows slower or shrinks.

A Look Back At Warren Buffett’s Best and Worst Oil & Gas Investments

Berkshire Hathaway Warren BuffettWarren Buffett is perhaps best known for his large investments in some of the world's most recognizable brands, companies like Coca-Cola, American Express and Apple. Q1 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Companies that fit into this bracket seem to fall squarely within his circle of competence. They sell a product that's easy to Read More

We would do better with austerity.  The economy would grow faster with a balanced budget, and a sense that government was not out of control.  Shrinking the bureaucracy and its rules, would allow the economy to grow faster.  Delegate more responsibilities to the states, particularly regulation of financial companies.  Relatively few insurers fail, which are state-regulated.  Many banks fail, which are federally regulated.  It is far easier to co-opt a single federal regulator than many state regulators.  Best yet, split all of the too big to fail banks into 51 entities, divided into the states and DC.  No more interstate branching — that’s the real problem, not Glass-Steagall.

Limiting banking to states keeps it small, Glass-Steagall tinkers at the edges, but if banks are kept small by limiting their size by states, like insurers, they won’t become systemic problems.  Simple, huh?

Much like the AT&T breakup, I think a breakup of intrastate banking would be good for the US economy.  It would unleash competition in financial services, and would eliminate systemic risk in the financial economy.  And once banking regulation is returned to the states, like insurance, we can eliminate the Fed, which has been a poor regulator of banks, and a bad manager of monetary policy.  Go back to a gold standard, or at worst a currency board.  Get money out of the hands of the government, who diverts much of the economics back to themselves.

By David Merkel, CFA of Aleph Blog

Previous articleMoody’s Downgrade of Italian Banks is No Reason for Panic
Next articleTelefonica S.A. (TEF) False Dividend Announcement
David J. Merkel, CFA, FSA — 2010-present, I am working on setting up my own equity asset management shop, tentatively called Aleph Investments. It is possible that I might do a joint venture with someone else if we can do more together than separately. From 2008-2010, I was the Chief Economist and Director of Research of Finacorp Securities. I did a many things for Finacorp, mainly research and analysis on a wide variety of fixed income and equity securities, and trading strategies. Until 2007, I was a senior investment analyst at Hovde Capital, responsible for analysis and valuation of investment opportunities for the FIP funds, particularly of companies in the insurance industry. I also managed the internal profit sharing and charitable endowment monies of the firm. From 2003-2007, I was a leading commentator at the investment website Back in 2003, after several years of correspondence, James Cramer invited me to write for the site, and I wrote for RealMoney on equity and bond portfolio management, macroeconomics, derivatives, quantitative strategies, insurance issues, corporate governance, etc. My specialty is looking at the interlinkages in the markets in order to understand individual markets better. I no longer contribute to RealMoney; I scaled it back because my work duties have gotten larger, and I began this blog to develop a distinct voice with a wider distribution. After three-plus year of operation, I believe I have achieved that. Prior to joining Hovde in 2003, I managed corporate bonds for Dwight Asset Management. In 1998, I joined the Mount Washington Investment Group as the Mortgage Bond and Asset Liability manager after working with Provident Mutual, AIG and Pacific Standard Life. My background as a life actuary has given me a different perspective on investing. How do you earn money without taking undue risk? How do you convey ideas about investing while showing a proper level of uncertainty on the likelihood of success? How do the various markets fit together, telling us us a broader story than any single piece? These are the themes that I will deal with in this blog. I hold bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Johns Hopkins University. In my spare time, I take care of our eight children with my wonderful wife Ruth.