YONG: Further Evidence Calling for Regulator Scrutiny?


Investors and analysts have for the past year or so have hurled accusations of fraud at Yongye International, Inc. (NASDAQ: YONG), with its seemingly too good to be true business model. It appears riddled with related party transactions and the acquisition of assets of dubious quality from those related parties for tens of millions of dollars. In this update we present further evidence of Yongye playing fast and loose with the facts as it seeks to present a bullish case to investors and evade auditor scrutiny. Specifically, we believe Yongye is overstating its raw material costs by at least 50x in an effort to manage the margins it reports on an inflated top line. We urge the NASDAQ, the SEC, and KPMG to closely examine the evidence put forth in the public domain in their efforts to protect public shareholders and defend the integrity of our financial markets.

Prescience’ initial analysis and full disclaimer can be downloaded HERE – or can be viewed below:

YONG Report Final

Q2 Hedge Funds Resource Page Now LIVE!!! Lives, Conferences, Slides And More [UPDATED 7/12]

Q2 Hedge Funds Resource PageSimply click the menu below to perform sorting functions. This page was just created on 7/1/2020 we will be updating it on a very frequent basis over the next three months (usually at LEAST daily), please come back or bookmark the page. As always we REALLY really appreciate legal letters and tips on hedge funds Read More

Yongye claims that humic acid – the supposed key ingredient of the company’s Shengmingsu fertilizer – makes up a great part of its costs. In its response letter to an SEC inquiry, Yongye stated (question 7), that “Humic acid accounts for over 50% of our cost of goods sold and is derived from lignite coal. We believe that our gross margin will show incremental improvement if we start to use our own coal in the future.”

Our research reveals that its response to the Securities and Exchange Commission is implausible and, further, that its investment in a coal mine is not likely to produce the gross margin improvements that the company is touting.

According to Yongye’s most recent 10-K, in 2010, the company’s cost of sales was $94,833,834 and it sold 18,800 tons of Shengmingsu, implying an average cost of $5,044/ton per Shengmingsu (Shengmingsu made up 97% of sales in 2010). According to Yongye’s response to the SEC inquiry, of this amount more than half, ~$2,500/ton of Shengminsgsu, is due to humic acid costs.

This is impossible; Yongye’s statements to the SEC simply do not add up with claims made in its own fertilizer license filed in China and market realities. Humic and fulvic acid (i.e. water-soluble humic acid) can be sourced for well under $1,000/metric ton (examples hereherehere, and here). According to Yongye’s own fertilizer license (here and here), each ton of Shengmingsu requires 50 kilograms of humic acid. Thus, a ton of humic acid is sufficient to produce roughly 20 tons of Shengmingsu.

In other words, assuming Yongye pays at the upper threshold of market prices for its primary raw material, it pays $1000/ton. Each ton of raw material is sufficient to produce 20 tons of Shengmingsu according to Yongye’s patents, so based on market prices humic acid costs the company no more than ~$50/ton of Shengmingsu.

Yongye claims in its SEC response to spend $2,500/ton of Shengminsu on humic acid, seemingly exaggerating its cost by at least 50x. There are a number of reasons why Yongye may choose to inflate its costs: sales made to related parties

  • Margins would otherwise look high beyond any realm of reality, especially in light of what we believe may be revenues inflated on the basis of sales made to related parties.
  • Since the purchases flow through Wuchuan Shuntong (which it has been alleged, and we believe likely, is a related party), the cash may be getting ‘recycled’ (i.e. laundered).
  • KPMG, Yongye’s auditor since 2009, would surely be asking questions about the absence of cash in Yongye’s bank accounts

In summary, we find various parts of Yongye’s response to the SEC’s questions wholly inadequate and in this case misleading. We strongly believe the Company is playing fast and loose with the facts as it seeks to present a bullish case to investors, and we have great doubts regarding Yongye’s customers, its purported revenues and reported profits.

Based on a business model riddled with inconsistencies, we believe Yongye International has historically served as a conduit for transferring wealth from outside investors into the pockets of company affiliates. We again urge the NASDAQ, the SEC, and KPMG to take a look at Yongye’s largest customers and suppliers and to examine the many allegations made by others – including the ones here, here, here, here and here – in an effort to protect the public interest and defend the integrity of US financial markets.Prescience Investment Group, our affiliates, client accounts and other contributors to the report are short and own options in the securities of YONG and stand to realize gains in the event that the price of the stock declines. We may buy, sell or short shares of YONG at any time. We will not disclose if we discover something faulty with our analysis at a later date.

Please read Prescience Investment Group LLC’s full disclaimer at the end of our report, which we hereby incorporate by reference in full.

This email does not constitute investment advice or an investment recommendation of any sorts.