Business

Q3 One Of Worse Ever QuartersFor Reinsuers But They Will Survive

It is indisputable that 2017 has been a challenging year in regards to natural disasters. Hurricane Harvey wrought more than $180 billion in damage to Texas, while Hurricane Maria cost upwards of $95 billion, according to some estimates. With California wildfires raging from north to south and Moody’s now factoring in climate change-related damages into its municipal bond stability forecasts, the stability of the reinsurance idustry might now seem in question. But that does not appear to be an issue, according to a December report on insurance stability.

Get The Timeless Reading eBook in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Timeless Reading in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

Reinsurance Industry

After one of the worst quarters in reinsurance history, 2017 expected to be a largely profitable year

The third quarter of 2017 ranks among history’s worst for large catastrophic losses in the reinsurance industry.

Individual insurers such as Munich Re, Swiss Re and Berkshire have experienced losses near $3.7 billion, $2.1 billion and $3 billion respectively – and the toll from California wildfires has yet to be fully accounted for. But despite the losses, many of the reinsurance firms are going to remain profitable nonetheless.

In an Outlook Research report, Senior Analysts Brandan Holmes, Sid Ghosh, James Eck and their team review the global reinsurance business and despite the stress see a profitable business model on the year.

“Deteriorating profitability has not significantly diminished returns of capital, with cash returns to shareholders averaging 8.3% of reported equity from 2013 to 2016,” the report noted. “Reinsurers have returned significant capital to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks, although some have indicated capital returns might decrease in the wake of heavy Q3 losses.”

Strong balance sheets and mergers that led to diversification strengthen the Reinsurance industry

What they find are strong balance sheets, good capitalization and moderate leverage as a resiliency towards major hurricane losses. This comes as underwriting has remained disciplined, re-insurers have reduced exposure to catastrophic risks and have largely adjusted to a “new normal” environment where natural disasters are the expected norm.

While hurricanes and wildfires benchmarked 2017, in 2018 it might be earthquakes that take their toll on the reinsurance industry. Geologists Roger Bilham of the University of Colorado, Boulder, and Rebecca Bendick of the University of Montana predict that 2018 could be the year of the earthquake.

Moody’s outlook could change from stable to positive but the more likely outcome could be a change to negative depending on how financial events play themselves out.

A change to positive is “unlikely,” Moody’s noted, largely because they don’t expect “pricing firming” to take place.

“A positive outlook is unlikely in the next 12-18 months, mainly because our reinsurance ratings are positioned on a through-the-cycle basis, but also because we only expect only moderate price firming to result from the Q3’17 hurricane losses,” the report observed.

While a change from stable to positive is dependent on a few factors, the move to a negative outlook has meaningfully more potential outcomes framing the situation.

If a material erosion in the reinsurers capital position were to change coupled with price declines, this could impact the outlook. If underwriting discipline “meaningfully deteriorated” along with significant out of sample claims could also force a re-evaluation of the industry.

“Modeled natural catastrophe exposure (net basis) has decreased in line with price softening on property-cat business and increased use of retrocession,” the report noted. “Reinsurers' capitalization, including their modeled economic capital levels, indicate that they are resilient to a range of stress scenarios.”

Another factor adding to reinsurance industry strength has been the trend of smaller and more financial exposed firms being acquired by larger and more diverse groups to create a more diversified risk profile. There has also been a move to diversify product lines, which, likewise, is driving an improved industry outlook.